Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 22 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 71 (703), e85-e94
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2020.0783
Abstract
Background Mental health treatment rates are increasing, but the burden of disease has not reduced. Tools to support efficient resource distribution are required. Aim To investigate whether a person-centred e-health (Target-D) platform matching depression care to symptom severity prognosis can improve depressive symptoms relative to usual care. Design and setting Stratified individually randomised controlled trial in 14 general practices in Melbourne, Australia, from April 2016 to February 2019. In total, 1868 participants aged 18–65 years who had current depressive symptoms; internet access; no recent change to antidepressant; no current antipsychotic medication; and no current psychological therapy were randomised (1:1) via computer-generated allocation to intervention or usual care. Method The intervention was an e-health platform accessed in the GP waiting room, comprising symptom feedback, priority-setting, and prognosis-matched management options (online self-help, online guided psychological therapy, or nurse-led collaborative care). Management options were flexible, neither participants nor staff were blinded, and there were no substantive protocol deviations. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) at 3 months. Results In intention to treat analysis, estimated between- arm difference in mean PHQ-9 scores at 3 months was −0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.45 to −0.31) favouring the intervention, and −0.59 at 12 months (95% CI = −1.18 to 0.01); standardised effect sizes of −0.16 (95% CI = −0.26 to −0.05) and −0.10 (95% CI = −0.21 to 0.002), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion Matching management to prognosis using a person-centred e-health platform improves depressive symptoms at 3 months compared to usual care and could feasibly be implemented at scale. Scope exists to enhance the uptake of management options.This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Burden of Depressive Disorders by Country, Sex, Age, and Year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010PLoS Medicine, 2013
- Collaborative Chronic Care Models for Mental Health ConditionsMedical Care, 2013
- Collaborative Care to Improve the Management of Depressive Disorders: A Community Guide Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2012
- Implementing a stepped-care approach in primary care: results of a qualitative studyImplementation Science, 2012
- Stepped care treatment for depression and anxiety in primary care. a randomized controlled trialTrials, 2011
- Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to Screen for Major Depression in the Primary Care PopulationAnnals of Family Medicine, 2010
- Internet Treatment for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician AssistancePLOS ONE, 2010
- Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care. A systematic reviewBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety DisorderArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001