Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Decreasing Barriers and Increasing Facilitators for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients
- 7 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 29 (8), 1564-1569
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1199
Abstract
Background:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, in part because one-third of Americans fail to get screened. In a prior randomized controlled trial, we found that an iPad patient decision aid called Mobile Patient Technology for Health-CRC (mPATH-CRC) doubled the proportion of patients who completed CRC screening. Methods:All data for the present analysis was collected as part of a randomized-controlled trial to determine the impact of mPATH-CRC on receipt of CRC screening within 24 weeks. Participants were enrolled from 6 community-based primary care practices between June 2014 and May 2016 and randomized to either usual care or mPATH-CRC. Six potential mediators of the intervention effect on screening were considered. The Iacobucci method was used to assess the significance of the mediation. Results:A total of 408 patients had complete data for all potential mediators. Overall, the potential mediators accounted for approximately three-fourths (76.3%) of the effect of the program on screening completion. Perceived benefits, self-efficacy, ability to state a screening decision, and patient/provider discussion were statistically significant mediators. Patient/provider discussion accounted for the largest proportion of the effect of mPATH-CRC (70.7%). Conclusions: mPATH-CRC increased completion of CRC screening by affecting patient-level and system-level mediators. However, the most powerful mediator was the occurrence of a patient-provider discussion about screening. Digital interventions like mPATH-CRC are an important adjunct to the patient/provider encounter. Impact:Understanding the factors that mediated mPATH-CRC's success is paramount to developing other effective interventions.Funding Information
- NCI (R01CA178941)
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1TR001420)
- Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30CA012197)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontierJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2012
- Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—A systematic review of the literaturePatient Education and Counseling, 2012
- Effectiveness of a Web-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aid: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Mixed-Literacy PopulationAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008International Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processingPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Translating Primary Care Practice Climate into Patient ActivationMedical Care, 2008
- Brief Report: screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skillsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Colorectal cancer screening: Physician recommendation is influential advice to MarylandersPreventive Medicine, 2005
- Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?American Journal of Public Health, 2003
- Validation of Scales to Measure Benefits of and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 2001