Mathematical modelling of the influence of serosorting on the population-level HIV transmission impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis
Open Access
- 31 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in AIDS
- Vol. 35 (7), 1113-1125
- https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002826
Abstract
Objectives: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may change serosorting patterns. We examined the influence of serosorting on the population-level HIV transmission impact of PrEP, and how impact could change if PrEP users stopped serosorting. Design: We developed a compartmental HIV transmission model parameterized with bio-behavioural and HIV surveillance data among MSM in Canada. Methods: We separately fit the model with serosorting and without serosorting [counterfactual; sero-proportionate mixing (random partner-selection proportional to availability by HIV status)], and reproduced stable HIV epidemics with HIV-prevalence 10.3-24.8%, undiagnosed fraction 4.9-15.8% and treatment coverage 82.5-88.4%. We simulated PrEP-intervention reaching stable pre-specified coverage by year-one and compared absolute difference in relative HIV-incidence reduction 10 years post-intervention (PrEP-impact) between models with serosorting vs. sero-proportionate mixing; and counterfactual scenarios when PrEP users immediately stopped vs. continued serosorting. We examined sensitivity of results to PrEP-effectiveness (44-99%; reflecting varying dosing or adherence levels) and coverage (10-50%). Results: Models with serosorting predicted a larger PrEP-impact than models with sero-proportionate mixing under all PrEP-effectiveness and coverage assumptions [median (interquartile range): 8.1% (5.5-11.6%)]. PrEP users' stopping serosorting reduced PrEP-impact compared with when PrEP users continued serosorting: reductions in PrEP-impact were minimal [2.1% (1.4-3.4%)] under high PrEP-effectiveness (86-99%); however, could be considerable [10.9% (8.2-14.1%)] under low PrEP effectiveness (44%) and high coverage (30-50%). Conclusion: Models assuming sero-proportionate mixing may underestimate population-level HIV-incidence reductions due to PrEP. PrEP-mediated changes in serosorting could lead to programmatically important reductions in PrEP-impact under low PrEP-effectiveness. Our findings suggest the need to monitor sexual mixing patterns to inform PrEP implementation and evaluation.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis for Men Who Have Sex With Men in AustraliaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2014
- Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Behavioral Risk Factors Associated With Per Contact Risk of HIV Infection Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United StatesJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2014
- Closing the Gap: Increases in Life Expectancy among Treated HIV-Positive Individuals in the United States and CanadaPLOS ONE, 2013
- Seroadaptation among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Emerging Research ThemesCurrent HIV/AIDS Reports, 2013
- Sexual Frequency and Planning Among At-Risk Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United StatesJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2012
- Preexposure Chemoprophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men Who Have Sex with MenThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Serosorting May Increase the Risk of HIV Acquisition Among Men Who Have Sex With MenSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2010
- A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biologyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2008
- Time from HIV-1 seroconversion to AIDS and death before widespread use of highly-active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative re-analysisThe Lancet, 2000
- Contact Tracing and the Estimation of Sexual Mixing PatternsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1993