Do Social Determinants Define “Too Sick” to Transplant in Patients With End-stage Liver Disease?
- 1 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Transplantation
- Vol. 104 (2), 280-284
- https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000002858
Abstract
Background. Delisting for being “too sick” to be transplanted is subjective. Previous work has demonstrated that the mortality of patients delisted for “too sick” is unexpectedly low. Transplant centers use their best clinical judgment for determining “too sick,” but it is unclear how social determinants influence decisions to delist for “too sick.” We hypothesized that social determinants and Donor Service Area (DSA) characteristics may be associated with determination of “too sick” to transplant. Methods. Data were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for adults listed and removed from the liver transplant waitlist from 2002 to 2017. Patients were included if delisted for “too sick.” Our primary outcome was Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at waitlist removal for “too sick.” Regression assessed the association between social determinants and MELD at removal for “too sick.” Results. We included 5250 delisted for “too sick” at 127 centers, in 53 DSAs, over 16 years. The mean MELD at delisting for “too sick” was 25.8 (SD ± 11.2). On adjusted analysis, social determinants including age, race, sex, and education predicted the MELD at delisting for “too sick” (P < 0.05). Conclusions. There is variation in delisting MELD for “too sick” score across DSA and time. While social determinants at the patient and system level are associated with delisting practices, the interplay of these variables warrants additional research. In addition, center outcome reports should include waitlist removal rate for “too sick” and waitlist death ratios, so waitlist management practice at individual centers can be monitored.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of race, socioeconomic status, and the health care system on the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in CaliforniaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015
- The outcomes of adult liver transplants in the United States from 1987 to 2013Liver International, 2015
- Scoring Systems for Predicting Mortality after Liver TransplantationPLOS ONE, 2014
- Underreporting of Liver Transplant Waitlist Removals Due to Death or Clinical DeteriorationTransplantation, 2013
- Program-specific reportsCurrent Opinion in Organ Transplantation, 2013
- Regional Variability in Liver Waiting List Removals Causes False Ascertainment of Waiting List DeathsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2012
- Center competition and outcomes following liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2012
- The Role of Race and Poverty on Steps to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United StatesAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2012
- Geographic Inequity in Access to Livers for TransplantationTransplantation, 2011
- Race and Ethnicity in Access to and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: A Critical Literature ReviewAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2009