Endometrial cancer in young women: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in women aged ≤40 years
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
- Vol. 30 (5), 631-639
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001105
Abstract
Objective Endometrial cancer in pre-menopausal patients aged <= 40 years is rare and poses both diagnostic and management challenges. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathologic factors associated with endometrial cancer in this group and their impact on survival. Methods Patients with endometrial cancer treated between January 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent either primary surgical treatment or fertility-sparing therapy were included. Exclusion criteria were age >60 years and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary radiation. Age at diagnosis was used to classify patients into two groups: <= 40 and 41-60 years. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared between the groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards. Results A total of 551 patients were evaluated, of which 103 (18.7%) patients were <= 40 years and 448 (81.3%) were 41-60 years. Age <= 40 years was associated with higher body mass index (38.8 vs 35.8 kg/m(2), p=0.008), non-invasive cancers (54.2% vs 32.6%, p<0.001), lower uterine segment involvement (27.2% vs 22.5%, p<0.001), and less lymphovascular space invasion (16.8% vs 29.1%, p=0.015). The rate of synchronous ovarian cancer was 9.2% vs 0.7% in age 41-60 years (p<0.001), and 19% of women with endometrial cancer aged <= 40 years underwent fertility-sparing therapy. Grade, stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and lymph node status were associated with survival, and fertility-sparing therapy adversely affected the recurrence rate of the age <= 40 years cohort. Among all patients aged <= 60 years, mismatch repair deficiency due to MLH1 methylation was associated with worse progression-free survival, 48.6% vs 83.3% (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.17, p=0.032), and overall survival, 56.5% vs 90.0% (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.90, p=0.025). Conclusions Patients aged <= 40 years with endometrial cancer have more favorable prognostic factors and higher rates of synchronous tumors. Fertility-sparing therapy was associated with higher recurrence rates. The prognostic value of MLH1 methylation in this population warrants further investigation.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence and factors associated with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer: A population-based case-control studyGynecologic Oncology, 2012
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Lynch Syndrome in Women Less Than 50 Years of Age With Endometrial CancerObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Molecular, Pathologic, and Clinical Features of Early-Onset Endometrial Cancer: Identifying Presumptive Lynch Syndrome PatientsClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Multicenter Phase II Study of Fertility-Sparing Treatment With Medroxyprogesterone Acetate for Endometrial Carcinoma and Atypical Hyperplasia in Young WomenJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Improved Survival With an Intact DNA Mismatch Repair System in Endometrial CancerObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Endometrial cancer in women 45 years of age or younger: A clinicopathological analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Endometrial cancer in young, normal-weight womenGynecologic Oncology, 2005
- Toward New Strategies to Select Young Endometrial Cancer Patients for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Endometrial cancer in premenopausal women 45 years and youngerObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995