The danger of network meta‐analysis: Obscuring the evidence of probiotic strain‐specificity
- 15 May 2020
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Digestive Diseases
- Vol. 21 (7), 426-427
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12877
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which probiotic has the best effect on preventing Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea? A systematic review and network meta‐analysisJournal of Digestive Diseases, 2019
- Strain-Specificity and Disease-Specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisFrontiers in Medicine, 2018
- An observation on inappropriate probiotic subgroup classifications in the meta-analysis by Lau and ChamberlainInternational Journal of General Medicine, 2016
- Dose–Response Efficacy of a Proprietary Probiotic Formula of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and Clostridium difficile -Associated Diarrhea Prophylaxis in Adult PatientsThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010
- Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Effect of a Fermented Milk CombiningLactobacillus AcidophilusCL1285 andLactobacillus Caseiin the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled TrialCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2007