Implementing a Rapid, Two‐Step Delirium Screening Protocol in Acute Care: Barriers and Facilitators
- 20 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 69 (5), 1349-1356
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17026
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES An effective and efficient protocol for delirium identification is needed to improve health outcomes for older adults and reduce healthcare costs. This study describes the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of the ultra‐brief confusion assessment method (UB‐CAM), a rapid two‐step delirium identification protocol (ultra‐brief screen, followed by CAM in positives), field tested with hospitalized older adults (70+). DESIGN A qualitative descriptive design using observational data collection and brief semi‐structured interviews. SETTINGS An urban academic medical center and a community teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS Participants included 50 physician hospitalists, 189 registered nurses, and 83 nursing assistants (NAs). MEASUREMENTS Field researchers guided by a modified multi‐level implementation framework, collected observational data as participants administered the UB‐CAM (n = 767). Thematic analysis was conducted on five observational categories: structural, organizational, patient, clinician, and innovation. Field notes and brief semi‐structured interviews (n = 231) with clinicians, explored the utility, acceptability, and feasibility of the protocol, and supplemented the observations. RESULTS The UB‐CAM was generally positively received by all three clinician types. Six themes describe barriers and/or facilitators to implementing the UB‐CAM: (1) physical setting and milieu; (2) practice environment; (3) integrating into role; (4) adaptive techniques; (5) patient responses; and (6) systematic assessment. The composition and interaction of the six themes determined if the theme was expressed as a barrier or facilitator, affirming the importance of context when implementing system‐level delirium screening. CONCLUSION This is one of the first studies to test a two‐step process for delirium identification, and to involve NAs in screening, and the findings demonstrate overall support from clinicians for delirium identification, and describe the need for a multifaceted, contextualized, and systemic approach to implementation and evaluation of delirium screening.Funding Information
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR01104)
- National Institute on Aging (K24AG035075, R24AG054259, P01AG031720, R01AG030618, R01AG044518)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delirium in elderly peopleThe Lancet, 2014
- Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialistsInternational Psychogeriatrics, 2013
- Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measuresImplementation Science, 2013
- Relationship between delirium and behavioral symptoms of dementiaInternational Psychogeriatrics, 2012
- Predicting implementation from organizational readiness for change: a study protocolImplementation Science, 2011
- Importance of work environments on hospital outcomes in nine countriesInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2011
- Decibel levels and noise generators on four medical/surgical nursing unitsJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment MethodAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990