Interventions to Mitigate COVID-19 Misinformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2 December 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Health Communication
- Vol. 26 (12), 846-857
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.2021460
Abstract
The duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic depends largely on individual and societal actions which are influenced by the quality and salience of the information to which they are exposed. Unfortunately, COVID-19 misinformation has proliferated. Despite growing attempts to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation, there is still uncertainty regarding the best way to ameliorate the impact of COVID-19 misinformation. To address this gap, the current study uses a meta-analysis to evaluate the relative impact of interventions designed to mitigate COVID-19-related misinformation. We searched multiple databases and gray literature from January 2020 to September 2021. The primary outcome was COVID-19 misinformation belief. We examined study quality and meta-analysis was used to pool data with similar interventions and outcomes. 16 studies were analyzed in the meta-analysis, including data from 33378 individuals. The mean effect size of interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation was positive, but not statistically significant [d = 2.018, 95% CI (−0.14, 4.18), p = .065, k = 16]. We found evidence of publication bias. Interventions were more effective in cases where participants were involved with the topic, and where text-only mitigation was used. The limited focus on non-U.S. studies and marginalized populations is concerning given the greater COVID-19 mortality burden on vulnerable communities globally. The findings of this meta-analysis describe the current state of the literature and prescribe specific recommendations to better address the proliferation of COVID-19 misinformation, providing insights helpful to mitigating pandemic outcomes.Funding Information
- Foundation for a Smoke-Free World
- The Foundation accepts charitable gifts from PMI Global Services Inc.
- Foundation’s Bylaws and Pledge Agreement with PMI
- Foundation for a SmokeFree World, Inc
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach.Psychological Methods, 2014
- The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane ReviewsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Cognitive-behavioural interventions for children who have been sexually abusedEmergencias, 2012
- THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIESInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2012
- How Many Studies Do You Need?Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2010
- How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological StudiesCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 2010
- The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision ModelsMedical Decision Making, 2005
- Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.Psychological Methods, 1998
- meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studiesBMJ, 1998