Journal Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ)-
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 103-110; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i2.255
Abstract:The purpose of this study is to determine whether the model of effective teaching quantum teaching used in physics learning in SMA Negeri Jayaloka academic year 2017/2018. The methoud used is quasi eksperiment or pseudoexpansion. The type of research is quasiexperimental research, with the design used is one group pretest and posttest design. The population in this study is all students of class X SMA Negeri Jayaloka academic year 2017/2018. And as the sample is the class X.I which amounted to32 student consisting of 17 male students and15 famale students taken at random. Data retrieval is done by test and non test technique. The collected data were analyzed using ttest at significant level = 0,05 obtained by t value 4,69 more than t table 1,69. So it can be concluded that student learning outcomes by using the modelof learning Quantum Teaching significant completion. Student learning activites in the learning process in the active category. While student response after following learning in good category. Keywords: Quantum Teaching Learning Model, Learning Outcomes,
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 96-102; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i2.272
Abstract:The purpose of this research is to know the student learning activity on the implementation of Demonstration model. The type of this research is quantitative with experimental research method with pretest description posttest control group design or experimental control group design. The population in this study were all students of class X MA AlMuhajirin Tugumulyo, two classes were taken randomly that is class X1 as experiment class and class X2 as control class. Technique of collecting data using test technique, test score data of student analyzed by using t-test. Based on the analysis of posttest data of experimental class and control class with significant level α = 0,05 obtained tcount: 6.87 and ttable: 2.02 because t count more than t table then Ha accepted which means the average of experiment class grade is not same with class control. So it can be concluded that there is a significant influence Demonstration Method on Physics Learning Results class X Ma Al-Muhajirin Tugumulyo 2016/2017. Keywords: Demonstration Learning Model, Learning Outcomes.
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 89-95; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i2.269
Abstract:The purpose of this study is to find out the comparative description of student motivation on the newly developed campus in physics learning with a more advanced campus. To get a description of the students motivation, as many as 87 students selected at random from three different campuses were surveyed using Science Motivation Questionnaire II. The science motivation questionnaire consists of five components of motivation: intrinsic motivation, self-determination, self-efficacy, career motivation, and grade motivation. The results show that there is no significant difference between student motivation on the newly developed campus and student motivation on a more advanced campus in physics learning. If it is seen based on the motivation component, it is known that there is no significant difference between all components of student motivation on the newly developed campus with student motivation on campus which is more advanced. Keyword: Physics Learning Motivation, Physics Learning, and Physics Education
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 78-88; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i2.268
Abstract:The purpose of this research is to get the measurement result as a description of higher order thinking skill in taxonomy to analyze physics problem in SMA XI class. This study is descriptive qualitative through three stages, namely: initial development of the instrument, content validation and empirical, and measurement. The research has been conducted in the region of Central Bengkulu Regency. The instrument used has been validated by the expert. An empirical valiadation test was conducted by 95 students. A valid instrument is used to measure student's higher order thinking skills. The number of learners measured using a total sampling of 148 learners. The measurement result shows very high analyze ability 1 student or 0,5 percent, ability analyze high 59 student or 40 percent, ability analyze analyze 62 student or 42 percent, ability analyze low 25 student or 17 percent, ability analyze very low 1 student or 0, 5 percent. On the average it can be concluded that higher order thinking skills on taxonomy analyze students in Bengkulu Tengah included in medium criterion. Keyword: HOTS, Analyze, Physics
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 65-77; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i2.271
Abstract:The purpose of this research is to know the difference of student physics learning result by using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model. The type of research used is quantitative research with experimental research method. The population in this study are all students of class VIII SMP Negeri Air Lesing. In this study the entire population used as a sample, so this research is a sample study with class VIII. 1 as experimental class I and VIII. 2 as experimental class II. The data were collected using a test technique consisting of 7 essay questions. The collected data then analyzed using ttest is tcount = 2,104 and ttable = 2,021. with criteria t count more than ttable, then H0 rejected Ha accepted. Thus the hypothesis proposed in this study accepted the truth. Based on the results of research and discussion it can be concluded that there are differences in the results of physics learning using the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) learning model and Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model At SMP Negeri Air Lesing. Keywords: Learning Outcomes, STAD Teams Games Tournament (TGT)
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 49-58; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i1.102
Abstract:This study aims to determine whether there is an influence of Two Stay Two Stray learning model on physics learning outcomes of students of class 8 SMP Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau. This research type is experiment with design that used is pretest posttest control group design. The population in this study is the entire class 8 SMP Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau. The sample in this research is two classes taken at random, where class 8.2 as experiment class and class 8.1 as class. Technique of collecting data used is test. Collected data were analyzed using t test. Based on the results of analysis of pre test data with 95 percent confidence level obtained tcount 0.477 and ttable 2,000 because tcount less than ttable, then obtained the conclusion that the experimental class and ontrol class is homogeneous. While the results of posttest data analysis with 95 percent confidence level obtained tcount 1.2244 and ttable 2,000 because t count lees than ttable, then obtained the conclusion that there are differences in the results of physics learning between classes taught by Two Stay Two Stray learning model and class taught with lecture and question and answer method in class 8 SMP Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau. Keywords: Two Stay Two Stay, Learning Outcome Students
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 39-48; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i1.76
Abstract:This study aims to 1 find out the percentage change of kinematic misconscope of motion straight after remediation, 2 Student Response in remediation implementation with cooperative learning approach Student Team Achievement Division class 10 MAN 1 Model Lubuklinggau. Subjects were 21 students based on purposive sampling technique based on previous research conducted by Novitasri. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. Technique of data collecting done by triangulation that is diagnosis understanding student concept, interview and questionnaire of student response in learning. Remediation of misconceptions with cooperative learning approach Student Team Achievement Divisions showed that from 17 items tested before remediation mean misconception percentage 80,11 percent and after remediation to 37,53 percent 42.58 percent. Student response after remediation using STAD learning is very good. Keyword: Miskonsepsi, Remediasi, STAD
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 23-38; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i1.41
Abstract:This research entitled analysis of Creative Thinking Ability on Light Material Student of Class 8 SMP Xaverius Lubuklinggau. The purpose of this research is to describe students creative thinking ability in light matter, to know the students creative thinking ability in light matter when viewed from cognitive observation and affective observation, to know the difficulties experienced by students in achieving the indicators of creative thinking ability and determination solution to overcome student difficulties in achieving the indicators of creative thinking ability of class 8 SMP Xaverius Kota Lubuklinggau. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative, with case study research type. The subject of this research is all students of class 8 SMP Xaverius Kota Lubuklinggau. Data completion technique in this research is using technique triangulation that is cognitive observation technique, affective observation, and interview. Data analysis technique is descriptive qualitative analysis. The result showed that students thinking ability of class 8 junior Xaverius Kota Lubuklinggau still less creative 6,68 percent based on result of cognitive observation which was completed with interview result and creative enough category 57,74 percent result of affective observation. the recommendations that can be submitted in this research is the teacher will give equal opportunity to all students to be able to develop the ability of creative thinking in the learning process Keywords: Analysis, Creative Thinking, Light.
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 7-22; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i1.58
Abstract:This research is titled application of Make a Match Model on Physics Learning of Class X SMA 2 Lubuklinggau. This research is based on the low learning result of physics because of lack of interest and understanding of physics learning concept of students. The purpose of this research is to know the result of physics learning of class X student of SMA Negeri 2 Lubuklinggau after application of Make a Match model. The type of research is quantitative research with quasi experimental research method, with one group pre test and post test design. The population in this study is all students of class X SMA Negeri 2 Lubuklinggau. Samples were taken randomly by drawing, so that the class X1 was obtained. Technique of collecting data using test technique. Based on the results of post-test data analysis obtained the average value of students at 79.11 with 5 percent level of disturbance obtained tcount 2.98 and ttable 1.684 for thitung great than ttable, it can be concluded that the results of physics learning class X SMA 2 Lubuklinggau after applied Model Make a Macth is significantly declared complete. Keyword : Physics, Learning result, Make a Match.
Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), Volume 1, pp 59-64; doi:10.31539/spej.v1i1.69
Abstract:This research aims to produce Student Worksheet that is in suitable with the characteristics of laboratory work approach. This research also aims to cultivate the physics process skill of the students during the teaching of laboratory work.This is a Research and Development developed by Borg and Gall. The stages in this research are collecting information, making plan, developing initial product, conducting tryout, doing revision of the product. The initial tryout or limited tryout is done to grade 9 SMAN margabaru. The instrument is Lesson Plan, Student Worksheet validation sheet, physics process skill observation sheet, students response questionnaire. Data analysis is descriptive qualitative.The result shows that LKS developed based on expert validation test on the aspect of writing approach, the depth of physics concept, scoring aspects, student activity and physical appearance is in the criteria of very good. For LKS identity completeness, clarity of sentence and language is in the criteria of good. Meanwhile, the percentage of the physics process skill achievement as compiling the hypothesis, skill of identifying variables, skill of filling the tables, skill of making graphs, skill of investigation analysis and the skill of drawing conclusion, is 92 percent, 93 percent, 80 percent, 90 percent, 78 percent, dan 78 percent. Keywords: Student Worksheet (LKS), laboratoey work, physics process skill