International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Journal Information
ISSN / EISSN :
0020-7047 / 1572-8684
Current Publisher: Springer Netherlands (10.1007)
Former Publisher:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC (10.1023)
Total articles ≅ 1,731
Current Coverage
SCOPUS
AHCI
LOCKSS
Archived in
SHERPA/ROMEO
EBSCO
Filter:
Latest articles in this journal
Published: 25 February 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion pp 1-15; doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09791-1
The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 12 February 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion pp 1-18; doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09789-9
The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 11 February 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion pp 1-15; doi:10.1007/s11153-020-09784-6
The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Published: 29 January 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 89, pp 91-97; doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09788-w
Published: 12 January 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 89, pp 1-2; doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09787-x
Published: 6 January 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 89, pp 99-103; doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09786-y
Published: 5 January 2021
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion pp 1-23; doi:10.1007/s11153-020-09785-5
Published: 24 November 2020
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion pp 1-8; doi:10.1007/s11153-020-09783-7
Abstract:
Neil Sinhababu (Am Philos Q 54(1):89–98, 2017) has recently argued against the fine-tuning argument for God. They claim that the question of the universe’s fine-tuning ought not be ‘why is the universe so hospitable to life?’ but rather ‘why is the universe so hospitable to morally valuable minds?’ and that, moreover, the universe isn’t so hospitable. For it is metaphysically possible that psychophysical laws be substantially more permissive than they in fact are, allowing for the realisation of morally valuable consciousness by exceptionally simple physical states and systems, rather than the complex states of brains. I reply that Sinhababu’s argument rests upon unsupported claims and that we have reason to doubt that an omnibenevolent God would make the psychophysical laws more permissive than they in fact are.
Published: 20 November 2020
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion; doi:10.1007/s11153-020-09782-8
Published: 30 October 2020
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Volume 88, pp 229-230; doi:10.1007/s11153-020-09781-9
Abstract:
Department of Philosophy, Stetson University, Deland, FL, 32723, USA R. L. Hall You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Correspondence to R. L. Hall. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Reprints and Permissions Hall, R.L. Preface. Int J Philos Relig 88, 229–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-020-09781-9 Download citation Published: 30 October 2020 Issue Date: December 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-020-09781-9