Refine Search

New Search

Results in Pregnancy Hypertension: 3,438

(searched for: container_group_id:(12691))
Page of 69
Articles per Page
by
Show export options
  Select all
, D. Woelkers, W. Yao, Y. Jin, J. Espinoza, L. Kunz, C. Amegashie, M. Gencay, J. Harris,
Published: 1 September 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 33, pp 8-16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.05.001

Anna Peguero, Lorena Fernandez-Blanco, , Leticia Benitez, Alba Gonzalez, David Boada, Cristina Borràs, , , Sandra Hernandez, et al.
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 64-69; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.004

Abstract:
Preeclampsia remains the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Consequently, research has focused on validating tools to predict maternal outcomes regarding clinical and biochemical features from the maternal compartment. However, preeclampsia also leads to neonatal complications due to placental insufficiency and prematurity, being the early-onset type associated with the poorest outcome. Hence, it is imperative to study whether these existing tools can predict adverse neonatal outcome. To assess the predictive value for adverse neonatal outcome of Doppler ultrasound, angiogenic factors and multi-parametric risk-score models in women with early-onset severe preeclampsia. This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by early-onset (developed before 34 week's gestation) severe preeclampsia. 63 women with early-onset severe preeclampsia, 18 (28.6%) presented an adverse neonatal outcome. Placental growth factor (PlGF) showed the best discrimination between neonatal outcomes among angiogenic factors. PREP-L score is a multi-parametric risk-score for the prediction of complications in early-onset preeclampsia which includes maternal characteristics and clinical and analytical data obtained at admission. Good predictive values for the prediction of neonatal complications were found with the combination of PREP-L score with advanced Doppler (AUC ROC 0.9 95% CI 0.82-0.98]) and with PlGF levels (AUC ROC 0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.98]). The combination of maternal risk scoring (PREP-L score) with angiogenic factors or fetal Doppler ultrasound at the time of diagnosis of early-onset preeclampsia with severe features performs well in predicting adverse neonatal outcome.
Sarah Fitzgerald, , James Hogg, , Ty Turner, Lorena M. Amaral, Ngoc Hoang, , Owen Herrock, Nathan Campbell, et al.
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 50-56; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.002

, Ruyue Sun, , Rebecca Russell, Nadia Sarween, , Beata Hargitai, Tamas Marton, Desley A H Neil, Edwin Wong, et al.
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 43-49; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.001

Abstract:
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of obstetric morbidity, with no definitive therapy other than delivery. We aimed to compare complement markers in maternal and fetal circulation, and placental tissue, between women with PE and healthy pregnant controls. Maternal and umbilical cord blood was tested for iC3b, C3, C4, properdin, Ba and C5b-9, and placental tissue for C3d, C4d, C9 and C1q, from women with PE (n = 34) and healthy pregnant controls (n = 33). Maternal properdin and Ba tests were repeated in a separate validation cohort (PE n = 35; healthy pregnant controls n = 35). Complement concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood, and placental immunohistochemical complement deposition. Women with PE had significantly lower concentrations of properdin (mean: 4828 vs 6877 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and C4 (mean: 0.20 vs 0.31 g/l, p < 0.001), and higher Ba (median: 150 vs 113 ng/ml, p = 0.012), compared to controls. After controlling for gestational age at blood draw, average properdin concentration was 1945 ng/ml lower in PE vs controls (95 % CI: 1487-2402, p < 0.001). Of the cord blood markers assessed, only Ba differed significantly between PE and controls (median: 337 vs 233 ng/ml, p = 0.004). C4d staining of the syncytiotrophoblast membrane was increased in PE vs controls (median immunoreactivity score 3 vs 0, p < 0.001). Maternal properdin and C4 were significantly negatively correlated with placental C4d staining. Our data confirm excessive placental complement deposition associated with significant concurrent changes in maternal and fetal circulating complement biomarkers in PE. Inhibition of complement activation is a potential therapeutic target.
, Sue Tohill, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Jon Dorling, Eleni Gkini, Catherine A Moakes, Clive Stubbs, Jim Thornton, Peter von Dadelszen,
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 35-42; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.002

Elizabeth Oluwakemi Grillo, David Olalekan Awonuga, Iyabo Olabisi Florence Dedeke, Olusanya Abiodun, John O. Imaralu, John Obafemi Sotunsa, Olanrewaju Saheed Jimoh, Chimaobi Nwankpa
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 22-27; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.001

Kazushi Watanabe, Tomohito Okamoto, Takuya Saitou, Ai Iwasaki, Hiroshi Matsushita, Kosei Takeuchi, Akimasa Asai, Yasuhiko Ito, Masanori Hara, Akihiko Wakatsuki
Published: 1 June 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 1-6; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.02.001

Sani T.K. Wong, Daljit S. Sahota, Natalie K.L. Wong, Isabella Y.M. Wah, Xueqin Wang, S.L. Lau, C.P.H. Chiu, Patricia N.P. Ip,
Published: 30 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 28-34; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.003

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Bálint Alasztics, Árpád F. Kovács, Éva Pállinger, Katalin É. Szabó-Taylor, Gábor Szabó, Attila Molvarec, Akos Koller, János Rigó
Published: 1 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 54-59; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.002

Emma Bokström-Rees, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Roxanne Hastie, Sonja Schell, Catherine Cluver, Lina Bergman
Published: 1 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 38-45; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.001

Guilherme M. Nobrega, Jose P. Guida, Juliana M. Novaes, Larissa M. Solda, Luciana Pietro, Adriana G. Luz, Giuliane J. Lajos, Carolina C. Ribeiro-Do-Valle, Renato T Souza, Jose G. Cecatti, et al.
Published: 1 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 32-37; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.008

Marta Flor-Alemany, Jairo H. Migueles, Pedro Acosta-Manzano, Nuria Marín-Jiménez, Laura Baena-García, Virginia A. Aparicio
Published: 1 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 17-24; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.007

Serena Gumusoglu, Lauren Davis, Brandon Schickling, Eric Devor, Lydia Von Tersch, Mark Santillan, Donna Santillan
Published: 1 March 2023
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 1-3; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.005

Rachael Morris, Ahmed S.Z. Moustafa, Wondwosen Kassahun-Yimer, Sarah Novotny, Brittney Billsby, Amira Abbas,
Published: 1 January 2023
Sathida Chantanavilai, Kiattisak Kongwattanakul, Ratana Komwilaisak, Piyamas Saksiriwuttho, Sukanya Chaiyarach, Chatuporn Duangkam, Suppasiri Hayakungchat, Kaewjai Thepsuthammarat
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 226-231; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.003

Alice Maraschini, Silvia Salvi, Elisabetta Colciago, Edoardo Corsi, Irene Cetin, Massimo Lovotti, Serena Donati
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 204-209; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.012

Muisi A. Adenekan, Ayodeji A. Oluwole, , Adebayo I. Sekumade, Adegbenga A. Ajepe,
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 198-203; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.011

Louise Ghesquiere, Chantale Vachon-Marceau, John C. Kingdom, Ema Ferreira, Stephane Côté, Paul Guerby, Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Emmanuel Bujold
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 189-191; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.009

Alice Hurrell, Paula Busuulwa, Louise Webster, Kate Duhig, Paul T. Seed, Lucy C. Chappell, Andrew H. Shennan
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 177-180; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.006

Dandan Liu, Dan Luo, Huisheng Ge, Chengling Zhang, Sumei Wei, Deku Liang, Dongmei Tang, Juan Li, Yonghong Lin
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 181-188; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.005

Manisha Kumar, Kirti Balyan, Ekta Debnath, Shivangi Shankar, Aryahi Apte, Shreeja Jha
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 154-160; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.003

Ellen Menkhorst, Wei Zhou, Leilani Santos, Jian-Guo Zhang, Yves St-Pierre, Morag J. Young, Evdokia Dimitriadis
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 130-136; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.008

Yuxin Jiang, Wenyan Jiang, Yuejia Li, Weinan Gu, Hongdi Huang, Qixi Wei, Ge Bai, Jianhong Wang, Joshua D. Rizak, Zhu Zhou
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 161-170; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.08.008

Annelien C. de Kat, Jane E. Hirst, Mark Woodward, Fernando C. Barros, Hellen C. Barsosio, James A. Berkley, Maria Carvalho, Leila Cheikh Ismail, Rose McGready, Shane A. Norris, et al.
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 124-129; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.005

Rebecca Whybrow, Jane Sandall, Joanna Girling, Heather Brown, Paul T Seed, Marcus Green, Sarah Findlay, Louise Webster, Lucy C Chappell
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 137-144; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.007

Lalitha Samuel, Joseph Fera, Corey H. Basch
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 110-112; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.004

Correction
Grigorios Kalapotharakos, Daniel Ryd, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Maria E.V. Andersson, Håkan Arheden, Stefan R. Hansson, Erik Hedström
Published: 1 December 2022
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.002

Page of 69
Articles per Page
by
Show export options
  Select all
Back to Top Top