Results in Pregnancy Hypertension: 3,438
(searched for: container_group_id:(12691))
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 33, pp 8-16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.05.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 33, pp 1-7; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.05.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 57-63; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.003
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 64-69; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.004
Abstract:
Preeclampsia remains the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Consequently, research has focused on validating tools to predict maternal outcomes regarding clinical and biochemical features from the maternal compartment. However, preeclampsia also leads to neonatal complications due to placental insufficiency and prematurity, being the early-onset type associated with the poorest outcome. Hence, it is imperative to study whether these existing tools can predict adverse neonatal outcome. To assess the predictive value for adverse neonatal outcome of Doppler ultrasound, angiogenic factors and multi-parametric risk-score models in women with early-onset severe preeclampsia. This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by early-onset (developed before 34 week's gestation) severe preeclampsia. 63 women with early-onset severe preeclampsia, 18 (28.6%) presented an adverse neonatal outcome. Placental growth factor (PlGF) showed the best discrimination between neonatal outcomes among angiogenic factors. PREP-L score is a multi-parametric risk-score for the prediction of complications in early-onset preeclampsia which includes maternal characteristics and clinical and analytical data obtained at admission. Good predictive values for the prediction of neonatal complications were found with the combination of PREP-L score with advanced Doppler (AUC ROC 0.9 95% CI 0.82-0.98]) and with PlGF levels (AUC ROC 0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.98]). The combination of maternal risk scoring (PREP-L score) with angiogenic factors or fetal Doppler ultrasound at the time of diagnosis of early-onset preeclampsia with severe features performs well in predicting adverse neonatal outcome.
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 50-56; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 43-49; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.04.001
Abstract:
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of obstetric morbidity, with no definitive therapy other than delivery. We aimed to compare complement markers in maternal and fetal circulation, and placental tissue, between women with PE and healthy pregnant controls. Maternal and umbilical cord blood was tested for iC3b, C3, C4, properdin, Ba and C5b-9, and placental tissue for C3d, C4d, C9 and C1q, from women with PE (n = 34) and healthy pregnant controls (n = 33). Maternal properdin and Ba tests were repeated in a separate validation cohort (PE n = 35; healthy pregnant controls n = 35). Complement concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood, and placental immunohistochemical complement deposition. Women with PE had significantly lower concentrations of properdin (mean: 4828 vs 6877 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and C4 (mean: 0.20 vs 0.31 g/l, p < 0.001), and higher Ba (median: 150 vs 113 ng/ml, p = 0.012), compared to controls. After controlling for gestational age at blood draw, average properdin concentration was 1945 ng/ml lower in PE vs controls (95 % CI: 1487-2402, p < 0.001). Of the cord blood markers assessed, only Ba differed significantly between PE and controls (median: 337 vs 233 ng/ml, p = 0.004). C4d staining of the syncytiotrophoblast membrane was increased in PE vs controls (median immunoreactivity score 3 vs 0, p < 0.001). Maternal properdin and C4 were significantly negatively correlated with placental C4d staining. Our data confirm excessive placental complement deposition associated with significant concurrent changes in maternal and fetal circulating complement biomarkers in PE. Inhibition of complement activation is a potential therapeutic target.
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 35-42; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 22-27; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 18-21; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.02.003
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 7-9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.02.004
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 1-6; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.02.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 10-17; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.02.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 32, pp 28-34; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.003
The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 73-83; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.01.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 60-72; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.004
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 46-53; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.003
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 54-59; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 38-45; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 25-31; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.009
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 32-37; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.008
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 17-24; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.007
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 14-16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.006
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 1-3; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.005
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 31, pp 4-13; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.004
Pregnancy Hypertension; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2023.01.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 226-231; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.003
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 232-237; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 221-225; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.11.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 215-220; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.013
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 204-209; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.012
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 198-203; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.011
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 189-191; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.009
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 210-214; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.010
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 192-197; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.008
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 177-180; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.006
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 181-188; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.005
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 146-147; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.001
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 154-160; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.003
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.10.002
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 130-136; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.008
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 161-170; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.08.008
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 124-129; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.005
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 137-144; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.007
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 113-123; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.006
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 110-112; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.004
Pregnancy Hypertension, Volume 30, pp 97-102; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2022.09.001