Refine Search

New Search

Results: 6

(searched for: 10.29328/journal.jcad.1001012)
Save to Scifeed
Page of 1
Articles per Page
by
Show export options
  Select all
, , Paige Haecker, Binish Shingari, Jennifer Schleichter, Zümra Atalay
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Volume 52, pp 52-68; https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1358063

Abstract:
Using effect sizes from Erford, Paul, Oncken, Kress, & Erford ( 2014 Erford, B. T. , Paul, L. E. , Oncken, C. , Kress, V. E. , & Erford, M. R. (2014). Counseling outcomes for youth with oppositional behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00125.x [Google Scholar] ) meta-analysis for treatments of oppositional defiant disorder and Erford, Bardhoshi, Ross, Gunther, & Duncan ( 2017 Erford, B. T. , Bardhoshi, G. , Ross, M. , Gunther, C. , & Duncan, K. (2017). Meta-analysis of counseling outcomes for youth with conduct disorders. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12115 [Google Scholar] ) meta-analysis of conduct problems in school-aged youth, the 6 most commonly used disruptive behavior instruments were analyzed for practical and technical strengths and weaknesses, and best use recommendations for screening and counseling outcome research were provided. The instruments included the Achenbach System of Empirically-Based Assessment (ASEBA), Revised Behavior Problem Checklist, Self-Report Delinquency Checklist, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory/Sutter-Eyberg School Behavior Inventory, Conners–3 Rating Scale, and Parent Daily Report.
Chikit Au, Tony Woo
Published: 30 April 2011
Computer-Aided Design, Volume 43, pp 417-426; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.11.006

The publisher has not yet granted permission to display this abstract.
Page of 1
Articles per Page
by
Show export options
  Select all
Back to Top Top