Unity Is Intelligence: A Collective Intelligence Experiment on ECG Reading to Improve Diagnostic Performance in Cardiology
Open Access
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Intelligence
- Vol. 9 (2), 17
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020017
Abstract
Medical errors have a huge impact on clinical practice in terms of economic and human costs. As a result, technology-based solutions, such as those grounded in artificial intelligence (AI) or collective intelligence (CI), have attracted increasing interest as a means of reducing error rates and their impacts. Previous studies have shown that a combination of individual opinions based on rules, weighting mechanisms, or other CI solutions could improve diagnostic accuracy with respect to individual doctors. We conducted a study to investigate the potential of this approach in cardiology and, more precisely, in electrocardiogram (ECG) reading. To achieve this aim, we designed and conducted an experiment involving medical students, recent graduates, and residents, who were asked to annotate a collection of 10 ECGs of various complexity and difficulty. For each ECG, we considered groups of increasing size (from three to 30 members) and applied three different CI protocols. In all cases, the results showed a statistically significant improvement (ranging from 9% to 88%) in terms of diagnostic accuracy when compared to the performance of individual readers; this difference held for not only large groups, but also smaller ones. In light of these results, we conclude that CI approaches can support the tasks mentioned above, and possibly other similar ones as well. We discuss the implications of applying CI solutions to clinical settings, such as cases of augmented ‘second opinions’ and decision-making.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The incidence of diagnostic error in medicineBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- Contested Collective Intelligence: Rationale, Technologies, and a Human-Machine Annotation StudyComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2011
- Telemedicine: The role of specialist second opinion for GPs in the care of hypertensive patientsBlood Pressure, 2011
- Optimally Interacting MindsScience, 2010
- Designing for collective intelligenceCommunications of the ACM, 2010
- AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part III: Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized ElectrocardiologyJournal of Invasive Cardiology, 2009
- The “Laboratory” Effect: Comparing Radiologists' Performance and Variability during Prospective Clinical and Laboratory Mammography InterpretationsRadiology, 2008
- Causes of errors in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrial fibrillation by physiciansJournal of Electrocardiology, 2007
- A History of the origin, evolution, and impact of electrocardiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the JackknifeThe Annals of Statistics, 1979