Integrated graph measures reveal survival likelihood for buildings in wildfire events
Open Access
- 24 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 12 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19875-1
Abstract
Wildfire events have resulted in unprecedented social and economic losses worldwide in the last few years. Most studies on reducing wildfire risk to communities focused on modeling wildfire behavior in the wildland to aid in developing fuel reduction and fire suppression strategies. However, minimizing losses in communities and managing risk requires a holistic approach to understanding wildfire behavior that fully integrates the wildland’s characteristics and the built environment’s features. This complete integration is particularly critical for intermixed communities where the wildland and the built environment coalesce. Community-level wildfire behavior that captures the interaction between the wildland and the built environment, which is necessary for predicting structural damage, has not received sufficient attention. Predicting damage to the built environment is essential in understanding and developing fire mitigation strategies to make communities more resilient to wildfire events. In this study, we use integrated concepts from graph theory to establish a relative vulnerability metric capable of quantifying the survival likelihood of individual buildings within a wildfire-affected region. We test the framework by emulating the damage observed in the historic 2018 Camp Fire and the 2020 Glass Fire. We propose two formulations based on graph centralities to evaluate the vulnerability of buildings relative to each other. We then utilize the relative vulnerability values to determine the damage state of individual buildings. Based on a one-to-one comparison of the calculated and observed damages, the maximum predicted building survival accuracy for the two formulations ranged from \(58 - 64 \%\) for the historical wildfires tested. From the results, we observe that the modified random walk formulation can better identify nodes that lie at the extremes on the vulnerability scale. In contrast, the modified degree formulation provides better predictions for nodes with mid-range vulnerability values.
Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (70NANB15H044)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Housing Arrangement and Location Determine the Likelihood of Housing Loss Due to WildfirePLOS ONE, 2012
- A measure of individual role in collective dynamicsScientific Reports, 2012
- Land Management Practices Associated with House Loss in WildfiresPLOS ONE, 2012
- Identification of influential spreaders in complex networksNature Physics, 2010
- Scientific and social challenges for the management of fire-prone wildland–urban interfacesEnvironmental Research Letters, 2009
- Relating flame radiation to home ignition using modeling and experimental crown firesCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2004
- Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health InterventionsScience, 2003
- Chaos, fractals, nonlinear phenomena in Earth sciencesReviews of Geophysics, 1995
- A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on BetweennessSociometry, 1977
- A note on two problems in connexion with graphsNumerische Mathematik, 1959