Assessing mammal trapping standards in wild boar drop-net capture
Open Access
- 5 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 12 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17407-5
Abstract
Applying contemporary trapping standards when managing wildlife should no longer be an option, but a duty. Increasing wild boar populations originate a growing number of conflicts and hunting is the only cost-effective management option in most cases. However, new scenarios where hunting is unfeasible emerge and trapping necessities cope with lacking regulatory frameworks and technical guidelines. In this research, we evaluated drop nets, a capture method not considered by the international trapping standards, to capture Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), a wildlife species not included in the list of mammal species under the scope of the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (AIHTS). Less than 20% of the captured wild boars presented moderate or severe injuries attributable to the capture method, hence fulfilling the acceptance thresholds of the outdated AIHTS. Based on the new standards thresholds of acceptance, the humaneness of drop-nets in our study ranged 66–78%, under the 85% required. The capture success and selectivity were 100%, as ensured by operator-driven triggering, which should be considered the main strengths of this method, together with the minimization of animal suffering owing the short duration of the stressful situation. Additionally, in spite of the socially adverse environment, with people contrary to wild boar removal, no disturbances against the capture system or operations occurred. This is the first assessment of a drop-net capture method according to internationally accepted mammal trapping standards, with unconclusive results. However, there is a need for adapted procedures and thresholds of acceptance aimed at not-mechanical traps in general, and specifically at drop-nets. Compared to other live-capture methods, drop-nets minimize the duration of the stressful situation —at the expense of a strong adrenergic acute response—, maximize the probabilities of capturing entire sounders of prosocial species, which may be also considered as more humane, and has the ability to coordinate higher values of capture success, absolute selectivity and adaptability to difficult environments.Funding Information
- Ajuntament de Barcelona, Spain
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020-115046GB-I00)
- Generalitat de Catalunya (Serra Húnter Programme)
- European Social Fund (2016FI_B 00425, 2017FI_B1 00040, 2018FI_B2_00030)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan areaJournal of Mammalogy, 2013
- Trap-effectiveness and response to tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine anaesthesia in Eurasian wild boar captured with cage and corral trapsBMC Veterinary Research, 2013
- Azaperone and sudden death of drive net-captured southern chamoisEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2011
- Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humansPhilosophical Transactions B, 2009
- Comparative evaluation of effort, capture and handling effects of drive nets to capture roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2008
- Evaluation of Cage‐Traps and Cable Restraint Devices to Capture Red Foxes in SpainThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008
- Assessing the Helicopter and Net Gun as a Capture Technique for White‐Tailed DeerThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008
- Effect of the GnRH vaccine GonaCon on the fertility, physiology and behaviour of wild boarWildlife Research, 2008
- Modified drop-net for capturing ungulatesWildlife Society Bulletin, 2004
- Comparison of Techniques for Capturing Mountain GoatsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1974