Nucleic Acid and Immunological Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: Processes, Platforms and Pitfalls
Open Access
- 23 October 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 10 (11), 866
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110866
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis at an early stage of infection is essential for the successful management of any contagious disease. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is a pandemic that has affected 214 countries affecting more than 37.4 million people causing 1.07 million deaths as of the second week of October 2020. The primary diagnosis of the infection is done either by the molecular technique of RT-qPCR by detecting portions of the RNA of the viral genome or through immunodiagnostic tests by detecting the viral proteins or the antibodies produced by the host. As the demand for the test increased rapidly many naive manufacturers entered the market with novel kits and more and more laboratories also entered the diagnostic arena making the test result more error-prone. There are serious debates globally and regionally on the sensitivity and specificity of these tests and about the overall accuracy and reliability of the tests for decision making on control strategies. The significance of the test is also complexed by the presence of asymptomatic carriers, re-occurrence of infection in cured patients as well as by the varied incubation periods of the infection and shifting of the viral location in the host tissues. In this paper, we review the techniques available for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and probable factors that can reduce the sensitivity and specificity of the different test methods currently in vogue. We also provide a checklist of factors to be considered to avoid fallacious practices to reduce false positive and false negative results by the clinical laboratories.This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Evaluation of Three Homogenization Methods for Isolating Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nucleic Acids From Sputum Samples for Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCRAnnals of Laboratory Medicine, 2016
- Designs, formats and applications of lateral flow assay: A literature reviewJournal of Saudi Chemical Society, 2015
- Evaluation of the Indian TrueNAT micro RT-PCR device with GeneXpert for case detection of pulmonary tuberculosisInternational Journal of Mycobacteriology, 2014
- A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial ImmunityScience, 2012
- Two-Way Antigenic Cross-Reactivity between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Group 1 Animal CoVs Is Mediated through an Antigenic Site in the N-Terminal Region of the SARS-CoV NucleoproteinJournal of Virology, 2007
- Double-antigen sandwich ELISA for detection of antibodies to SARS-associated coronavirus in human serumEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.2004
- Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNANucleic Acids Research, 2000
- Standardization of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) for Quantitative Estimation of Antibodies Specific for Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis Virus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Parainfluenza-3 Virus, and Bovine Viral Diarrhea VirusJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1997
- ACYCLOVIR TRIPHOSPHATE INHIBITS THE DIAGNOSTIC POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR CYTOMEGALOVIRUSTransplantation, 1996