Where Are We Now?Urogynecologic Mesh and Present Recommendations
- 24 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Gynecologic Surgery
- Vol. 39 (1), 30-35
- https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2022.0051
Abstract
This article discusses mesh biology and known issues with mesh kits. The current mesh recommendations of national and international societies, as well as the impact of hysterectomy on mesh exposure during sacrocolpopexy are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Route of hysterectomy during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy does not affect postoperative outcomesInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2018
- Predictors of sling revision after mid‐urethral sling procedures: a case–control studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2018
- Short-Term Mesh Exposure after Robotic Sacrocolpopexy With and Without Concomitant HysterectomySouthern Medical Journal, 2014
- Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal ProlapseJAMA, 2014
- Three-Year Outcomes of Vaginal Mesh for ProlapseObstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
- Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshesHernia, 2012
- Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapseInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2012
- Mesh Erosion in Robotic SacrocolpopexyUrogynecology, 2012
- Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexyInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2010
- Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008