The Blacksburg Manifesto and the Postmodern Debate: Public Administration in a Time Without a Name
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Review of Public Administration
- Vol. 20 (2), 61-76
- https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409002000201
Abstract
The question, “Does the message of the Blacksburg Manifesto fit the times that we are in now and the times that seem to be shaping up in the next decade or longer?” is addressed by epistemologically locating the Blacksburg Manifesto and by introducing the postmodern debate to the field of public administration. The well-known Blacksburg Manifesto is described as an example of high modernism, beyond the functionalist paradigm, because although the central commitment is to reason and progress, the classic forms of administrative rationality are surpassed. It is classified as high modernism because the agency perspective, as articulated in the Manifesto, calls for a dialogue that evokes reason through process in the tradition of Mary Parker Follett. The postmodern experience is described as connoting a world of immense complexity, hyperdiversity, and self-referentiality. Postmodernism requires assuming a posture toward the world that tolerates fundamental ambiguity and paradox. A postmodern perspective on the Blacksburg Manifesto is presented and the central paradox of the Manifesto is exposed.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women, Fire, and Dangerous ThingsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1987
- Building a New American StatePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- The Essential TensionPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1977
- Tradition and AuthorityPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1972