Medicaid Cost Savings from Provision of Contraception to Beneficiaries in South Carolina, 2012–2018
- 1 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Population Health Management
- Vol. 25 (4), 542-550
- https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2021.0392
Abstract
This study assesses cost savings associated with specific contraceptive methods provided to beneficiaries enrolled in South Carolina Medicaid between 2012 and 2018. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, defined as the additional cost of contraception provision per live birth averted, were estimated for 4 contraceptive methods (intrauterine devices [IUDs], implants, injectable contraceptives, and pills), relative to no prescription method provision, and savings per dollar spent on method provision were calculated. Costs associated with publicly funded live births were derived from published sources. The analysis was conducted for the entire Medicaid sample and separately for individuals enrolled under low-income families (LIFs), family planning, and partners for healthy children (PHC) eligibility programs. Sensitivity analysis was performed on contraceptive method costs. IUDs and implants were the most cost-effective with cost savings of up to $14.4 and $7.2 for every dollar spent in method provision, respectively. Injectable contraceptives and pills each yielded up to $4.8 per dollar spent. However, IUDs and implants were less cost-effective than injectable contraceptives and pills if the average length of use was less than 2 years. Medicaid's savings varied across Medicaid eligibility programs, with the highest and lowest savings from contraceptive provision to women in the LIFs and PHC eligibility programs, respectively. The results suggest the need to account for unique needs and preferences of beneficiaries in different Medicaid eligibility categories during contraception provision. The findings also inform program administration and provide evidence to justify legislative appropriations for Medicaid reproductive health care services.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014
- Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraceptionContraception, 2012
- Publicly funded contraceptive care: a proven investmentContraception, 2011
- Number of Oral Contraceptive Pill Packages Dispensed and Subsequent Unintended PregnanciesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Cost–benefit analysis of state- and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United StatesContraception, 2010
- Health economics of contraceptionBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2009
- Cost Savings From the Provision of Specific Methods of Contraception in a Publicly Funded ProgramAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesContraception, 2009
- Contraceptive Failure of the Ovulation Method of Periodic AbstinenceInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 1990
- Age and InfertilityScience, 1986