Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 15 January 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 145, 1-13
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.007
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trialsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Availability of renal literature in six bibliographic databasesClinical Kidney Journal, 2012
- Searching for Controlled Trials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Comparison of 15 DatabasesEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011
- Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009
- What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion?Injury Prevention, 2008
- Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns?Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2004
- Doing New Research? Don't Forget the OldPLoS Medicine, 2004
- Bibliometric analysis of randomized trials in complementary medicineComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 1998