Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: Performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project
- 8 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 497, 35-40
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.07.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Call for more transparency in manufacturers declarations on serum indices: On behalf of the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE), European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2018
- Local quality assurance of serum or plasma (HIL) indicesClinical Biochemistry, 2018
- Precision, accuracy, cross reactivity and comparability of serum indices measurement on Abbott Architect c8000, Beckman Coulter AU5800 and Roche Cobas 6000 c501 clinical chemistry analyzerscclm, 2018
- Reporting altered test results in hemolyzed samples: is the cure worse than the disease?cclm, 2017
- Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”cclm, 2017
- Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” projectcclm, 2016
- Towards a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rightscclm, 2016
- Harmonization of automated hemolysis index assessment and use: Is it possible?Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2014
- Classifying Laboratory Incident Reports to Identify Problems That Jeopardize Patient SafetyAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2003