Reluctant financialisaton: Financialisaton without financialised subjectivities in Hungary and the United States
- 29 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 53 (4), 785-808
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20960740
Abstract
The Foucauldian literature on the ‘financialisation of everyday life’ has documented the way neoliberal discourses and practices call forth willing entrepreneurial-investorial and debtor financialised subjects. However, recent qualitative studies on the lived experiences of financialisation suggested that financialised households are often unwilling to adopt the subjectivities of neoliberal discourse (which we call ‘reluctant financialisation’) and only selectively draw on their elements (referred to as ‘variegated subjectivities’). This paper uses quantitative data to examine whether willing or reluctant financialisation is more widespread and if there are geographical, cross-country differences; and to assess the ‘variegated subjectivities’ argument. We conduct two studies: in the first, we compare the extent to which financialised households embrace key aspects of the financialised subjectivities called forth by neoliberal discourse in the mature financialised economy of the United States vs newly financialising Hungary. In the second, we examine the ‘variegated subjectivities’ hypothesis in Hungary. Our results show, first, that the majority of financialised households do not hold the financialised subject position fostered by neoliberal discourse. Second, they lend support to the ‘variegated subjectivities’ hypothesis. This means that reluctance, rather than whole-hearted embracement of neoliberal subjectivities is the main experience of financialisation. Household financialisation is neither driven nor legitimised by households ‘buying into’ neoliberal discourses. Although this may indicate a larger resistance potential in everyday life than previously assumed, we suggest a more negative interpretation: that of ‘domesticated neoliberalism’, which does not require neoliberal subjects but co-opts households’ existing moral economies.Funding Information
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (171351)
- Hungarian Scientific Research Funds (101261)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speculating on Everyday Life: The Cultural Economy of the QuotidianJournal of Communication Inquiry, 2010
- Geographies of Financialization in Disarray: The Dutch Case in Comparative PerspectiveEconomic Geography, 2009
- Privatised Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy RegimeThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2009
- Planning for a Future of Asset-based Welfare? New Labour, Financialized Economic Agency and the Housing MarketPlanning Practice & Research, 2009
- The Rise of Pension Fund Capitalism in Europe: An Unseen Revolution?New Political Economy, 2008
- Financial exclusion and the geography of bank and building society branch closure in BritainTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2008
- Varieties of Residential Capitalism in the International Political Economy: Old Welfare States and the New Politics of HousingComparative European Politics, 2008
- “All Gone Now”: The Material, Discursive and Political Erasure of Bank and Building Society Branches in BritainAntipode, 2008
- New Directions in Corporate GovernanceAnnual Review of Sociology, 2005
- Risk Aversion MeasuresFinancial Services Review, 1996