Clinical analysis of pain after transvaginal mesh surgery in patients with pelvic organ prolapse
Open Access
- 30 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Women's Health
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01192-w
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevant factors of pain after transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and to analyse the management and relief of the pain. Methods: A multicentre retrospective study of a clinical database of patients who underwent TVM surgery was conducted, and pain related aspects were analysed. Results: A total of 1855 patients were included in the study. We divided the patients into two groups: pain-free (1805 patients) and pain (50 patients) group. The incidence of pain after TVM surgery was 2.70%, with a median occurrence time of 7.5 months. Pain mainly involved the vagina, perineum, buttocks, groin, inner thighs, and lower abdomen. Excessive intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.284, 95% CI 0.868–2.401) and postoperative anatomic failure (OR = 1.577, 95% CI 0.952–3.104) were analysed as risk factors with statistical significance. Mesh exposure rate in the pain group was 38%, showing a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.01). Forty patients underwent non-surgical treatment, with a relief rate of 40.0%, 33 patients received surgical treatment, 15 underwent partial mesh removal, and 18 underwent complete mesh removal, with a relief rate of 84.8%. The total relief rate was 88% within all 50 patients suffering from pain. Conclusions: Excessive intraoperative bleeding and unsatisfactory postoperative anatomic outcomes can increase the risk of postoperative pain; mesh exposure is also associated with the pain. Most patients can get pain relief with proper management, more than half of whom may need mesh removal with differing approach.Keywords
Other Versions
Funding Information
- Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Project (18-014-4-29)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT)The Lancet, 2016
- Incidence and Risk Factors for Pelvic Pain After Mesh Implant Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor DisordersJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016
- Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapseEmergencias, 2016
- An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2016
- Purely Transvaginal/Perineal Management of Complications From Commercial Prolapse Kits Using a New Prostheses/Grafts Complication Classification SystemJournal of Urology, 2012
- Beyond the complications: medium-term anatomical, sexual and functional outcomes following removal of trocar-guided transvaginal mesh. A retrospective cohort studyInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2012
- Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapseInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2012
- Vaginal Mesh ContractionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Continuing Medical Education: The Role of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Pelvic and Genital Pain-Related Sexual Dysfunction (CME)The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2008
- Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: A longitudinal study of menopausal womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004