Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests to real time polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 16 September 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 144, 104985
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104985
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Jeju National University
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, ChinaJAMA, 2020
- Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCREurosurveillance, 2020
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy StudiesJAMA, 2018
- Diagnostic performance of influenza viruses and RSV rapid antigen detection tests in children in tertiary careJournal of Clinical Virology, 2016
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2015
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracyHealth Technology Assessment, 2005