Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering (3)
- 12 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
- Vol. 45 (4), 17
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3417564.3417567
Abstract
The 'Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering' column of SEN aims at fostering a constructive and stimulating discussion on peer-reviewing in software engineering venues. This third editorial introduces two new contributions to the column, providing the positions and perspectives by the Editors-in-Chief of two internationally renowned software engineering journals.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-blind is good but open would be betterACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality InitiativeACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software EngineeringACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020