THE NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING SCIENCE
Open Access
- 10 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientia Socialis Ltd in Journal of Baltic Science Education
- Vol. 20 (5), 840-856
- https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.840
Abstract
Scientific evidence-based reasoning has been recognized as a form of reasoning that characterizes scientific thinking. This study questioned what scientific evidence means in the various types of scientific activities; that is, this study explored the nature of scientific evidence (NOSE). To do this, previous studies were examined to understand how scientific evidence was analyzed, evaluated, and utilized during the scientific activities of scientists or students in scientific or everyday situations. Through this process, seven statements were identified to describe the NOSE. This study explains these seven NOSE statements, constructs a process of scientific evidence-based reasoning as a structured form by reflecting these seven statements comprehensively, and discusses the practical implications for teaching science in schools. Finally, the limitations of this study are discussed, and possible directions for future studies are suggested. It is believed that the list of NOSE characteristics can provide a starting point for further elucidation and discussion of scientific evidence and helping students’ science learning in more authentic ways. Keywords: evidence evaluation, evidence-based reasoning, evidence-based response, idea-based response, scientific evidenceKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems ResearchSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific ExplanationsCognition and Instruction, 2005
- Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science EducationStudies in Science Education, 2002
- Analysis of students' processes of confirmation and falsification of their prior ideas about electrostaticsInternational Journal of Science Education, 2001
- Millikan?s Oil-Drop ExperimentsThe Chemical Educator, 1997
- What do tests of “formal” reasoning actually measure?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1992
- Laboratory replication of scientific discovery processesCognitive Science, 1990
- When Covariation Is Not Enough: The Role of Causal Mechanism, Sampling Method, and Sample Size in Causal ReasoningChild Development, 1989
- Scientists' Understanding of Propositional Logic: An Experimental InvestigationSocial Studies of Science, 1983
- Concepts of EvidenceMind, 1978