Substantial heterogeneity found in reporting mortality in Cochrane systematic reviews and Core Outcome Sets in COMET database
- 16 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 145, 47-54
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.006
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Pfizer (58858477)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013Trials, 2014
- Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2014
- Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic reviewBMJ, 2013
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting GuidelinesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyBMJ, 2008
- Weighing the pros and cons for composite outcomes in clinical trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysisTrials, 2007
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Cause of death in clinical research: Time for a reassessment?Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 1999