When Even a Robot Tutor Zooms: A Study of Embodiment, Attitudes, and Impressions
Open Access
- 30 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Abstract
This study used an online second language (L2) vocabulary lesson to evaluate whether the physical body (i.e., embodiment) of a robot tutor has an impact on how the learner learns from the robot. In addition, we tested how individual differences in attitudes toward robots, first impressions of the robot, anxiety in learning L2, and personality traits may be related to L2 vocabulary learning. One hundred Turkish-speaking young adults were taught eight English words in a one-on-one Zoom session either with a NAO robot tutor (N = 50) or with a voice-only tutor (N = 50). The findings showed that participants learned the vocabulary equally well from the robot and voice tutors, indicating that the physical embodiment of the robot did not change learning gains in a short vocabulary lesson. Further, negative attitudes toward robots had negative effects on learning for participants in the robot tutor condition, but first impressions did not predict vocabulary learning in either of the two conditions. L2 anxiety, on the other hand, negatively predicted learning outcomes in both conditions. We also report that attitudes toward robots and the impressions of the robot tutor remained unchanged before and after the lesson. As one of the first to examine the effectiveness of robots as an online lecturer, this study presents an example of comparable learning outcomes regardless of physical embodiment.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual differences in willingness to become an organ donor: A decision tree approach to reasoned actionPersonality and Individual Differences, 2013
- How relevant is social interaction in second language learning?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013
- Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps.Developmental Psychology, 2013
- Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infantsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for ChildrenJournal of Information Processing Systems, 2008
- Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed modelsJournal of Memory and Language, 2008
- Language and Theory of Mind: Meta‐Analysis of the Relation Between Language Ability and False‐belief UnderstandingChild Development, 2007
- First ImpressionsPsychological Science, 2006
- Bilingualism, Aging, and Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Simon Task.Psychology and Aging, 2004
- Social EmbodimentPublished by Elsevier BV ,2003