Interprofessional Abortion Opposition: A National Survey and Qualitative Interviews with Abortion Training Program Directors at U.S. Teaching Hospitals
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Guttmacher Institute in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Vol. 52 (4), 235-244
- https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12162
Abstract
CONTEXT Hospital policies and culture affect abortion provision. The prevalence and nature of colleague opposition to abortion and how this opposition limits abortion care in U.S. teaching hospitals have not been investigated. METHODS As part of a mixed‐methods study, a nationwide survey of residency and site directors at 169 accredited obstetrics‐gynecology training programs was conducted in 2015–2016, and 18 in‐depth interviews with program directors were conducted in 2014 and 2017. The prevalence and nature of interprofessional opposition were examined using descriptive statistics, and regional differences were investigated using logistic regression. A modified grounded theoretical approach was used to analyze interview data. RESULTS Among the 91% of survey respondents who reported that they or their colleagues had wanted or needed to provide abortions in the prior year, 69% faced opposition from colleagues. Most commonly, opposition came from nurses (58%), nursing administration (30%) and anesthesiologists (30%), manifesting as resistance to participating in or cooperating with procedures (51% and 38%, respectively). Fifty‐nine percent of respondents had denied care to patients in the prior year because of colleagues’ opposition. Respondents in the Midwest and South were more likely than those in the Northeast to deny abortion care to patients because of such opposition (odds ratios, 3.2 and 4.4, respectively). Interviews revealed how participants had to circumvent opposing colleagues, making abortion provision difficult and leading to delays in and, infrequently, denial of abortion care. CONCLUSIONS Interprofessional opposition to abortion is widespread in U.S. teaching hospitals. Interventions are needed that prioritize patients’ needs while recognizing the challenges hospital colleagues face in their abortion participation decisions.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abortion Policies in U.S. Teaching HospitalsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2020
- Sources of support for and resistance to abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019
- Induced Abortion Provision Among a National Sample of Obstetrician–GynecologistsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2019
- Barriers to D&E practice among family planning subspecialistsContraception, 2013
- Conflicts in Care for Obstetric Complications in Catholic HospitalsAJOB Primary Research, 2013
- Enablers of and Barriers to Abortion TrainingJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2013
- Obstetrician–Gynecologistsʼ Objections to and Willingness to Help Patients Obtain an AbortionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Willing and UnablePublished by JSTOR ,2010
- Obstacles to the Integration of Abortion Into Obstetrics and Gynecology PracticePerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2010
- Predictors of abortion provision among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists: A national surveyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008