Genicular Nerve Pulsed Dose Radiofrequency (PDRF) Compared to Intra-Articular and Genicular Nerve PDRF in Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Open Access
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Pain Research
- Vol. ume 13, 1315-1321
- https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s240138
Abstract
Background: Chronic knee osteoarthritic (OA) pain is a common and debilitating complaint in elderly patients. Despite numerous pharmaceutical options, the majority of patients still experience long-term pain. Genicular nerve (GN) radiofrequency has become increasingly popular as a treatment for knee pain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of pulse dose radiofrequency (PDRF) in patients with chronic knee OA pain. Patients and Methods: Propensity score matching analysis was performed in a retrospective cohort of 78 patients with moderate-severe knee OA pain unresponsive to conservative treatment who underwent PDRF GN or intra-articular (IA) and PDRF GN. Pain relief was measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 and 6 months post-intervention. Results: A significant reduction in NRS scores was reported at 3 (p< 0.001) and 6 months (p< 0.001) after PDRF in both groups. NRS was lower in PDRF IA + GN than PDRF GN (p< 0.0001). WOMAC pain was significantly reduced at 3 months in PDRF IA + GN group (baseline: 10.12± 3.14, 3 months: 6.25± 2.44, p=0.0001). WOMAC stiffness and function were improved only at 3 months in PDRF IA + GN compared to baseline (p=0.007 and p=0.006, respectively). A longer period of pain relief was reported after PDRF IA + GN (6.75± 2.42 months) compared to PDRF GN (4.31± 2.85 months, p< 0.001) in association with higher PGIC scores. Conclusion: This is the first study that compared two different PDRF techniques. PDRF GN and PDRF IA + GN were both effective in reducing pain at 3 and 6 months follow-up. However, only PDRF IA + GN was able to improve WOMAC scores at 3 months after the treatment with a longer period of efficacy compared to PDRF GN alone.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence of symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a two-phase population-based surveyOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2011
- Intra-articularly applied pulsed radiofrequency can reduce chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2011
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on MortalityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- Ultrastructural evaluation of pulsed radiofrequency and conventional radiofrequency lesions in rat sciatic nerveSurgical Neurology, 2009
- Ultrastructural Changes in Axons Following Exposure to Pulsed Radiofrequency FieldsPain Practice, 2009
- Pulsed radiofrequency effects on the lumbar ganglion of the rat dorsal root: a morphological light and transmission electron microscopy study at acute stageEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- Prevalence of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis and the Appropriateness of Joint Replacement in an Older PopulationJAMA Internal Medicine, 2008
- Intra‐articular Application of Pulsed Radiofrequency for Arthrogenic Pain—Report of Six CasesPain Practice, 2008
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1957