The effect of the spatial positioning of items on the reliability of questionnaires measuring affect
Open Access
- 22 April 2016
- journal article
- Published by AOSIS in SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
- Vol. 42 (1)
- https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1303
Abstract
Orientation: Extant research has shown that the relationship between spatial location and affect may have pervasive effects on evaluation. In particular, experimental findings on embodied cognition indicate that a person is spatially orientated to position what is positive at the top and what is negative at the bottom (vertical spatial orientation), and to a lesser extent, to position what is positive on the left and what is negative on the right (horizontal spatial orientation). It is therefore hypothesised, that when there is congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the spatial positioning (layout) of a questionnaire, the reliability will be higher than in the case of incongruence.Research purpose: The principal objective of the two studies reported here was to ascertain the extent to which congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the layout of the questionnaire (spatial positioning of questionnaire items) may impact on the reliability of a questionnaire measuring affect.Motivation for the study: The spatial position of items on a questionnaire measuring affect may indirectly impact on the reliability of the questionnaire.Research approach, design and method: In both studies, a controlled experimental research design was conducted using a sample of university students (n = 1825).Major findings: In both experiments, evidence was found to support the hypothesis that greater congruence between a respondent’s spatial orientation (related to affect) and the spatial positioning (layout) of a questionnaire leads to higher reliability on a questionnaire measuring affect.Practical implications: These findings may serve to create awareness of the influence of the spatial positioning of items as a confounding variable in questionnaire design.Contribution/value-add: Overall, this research complements previous studies by confirming the metaphorical representation of affect and enhances our understanding of embodiment-related conceptual processing and its subsequent influence on self-evaluations versus external evaluations on an unconscious level, specifically in relation to measuring affect.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Metaphorical Representation of AffectMetaphor and Symbol, 2005
- Why the Sunny Side Is UpPsychological Science, 2004
- Metaphors We Live ByPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2003
- Effects of Stem and Likert Response Option Reversals on Survey Internal Consistency: If You Feel the Need, There is a Better Alternative to Using those Negatively Worded StemsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2000
- A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey QuestionnairesOrganizational Research Methods, 1998
- Testing the Equality of Two Alpha CoefficientsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1996
- A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of OrganizationsJournal of Management, 1995
- Responses to the original and revised Job Diagnostic Survey: Is education a factor in responses to negatively worded items?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993
- Happiness: A Definitional EffortMetaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1991
- Depressive affect and perception of up-downJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1964