Maximizing cancer prevention through genetic navigation for Lynch syndrome detection in women with newly diagnosed endometrial and nonserous/nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer
Open Access
- 13 May 2021
- Vol. 127 (17), 3082-3091
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33625
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations for reflex immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins to identify Lynch syndrome (LS), the uptake of genetic assessment by those who meet referral criteria is low. The authors implemented a comprehensive genetic navigation program to increase the uptake of genetic testing for LS in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) or nonserous/nonmucinous ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS Participants with newly diagnosed EC or OC were prospectively recruited from 3 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Family history questionnaires were used to assess LS‐specific family history. Reflex IHC for MMR proteins was performed with the inclusion of clinical directives in pathology reports. A trained genetic navigator initiated a genetic referral on behalf of the treating physician and facilitated genetic referrals to the closest genetics center. RESULTS A total of 841 participants (642 with EC, 172 with OC, and 27 with synchronous EC/OC) consented to the study; 194 (23%) were MMR‐deficient by IHC. Overall, 170 women (20%) were eligible for a genetic assessment for LS: 35 on the basis of their family history alone, 24 on the basis of their family history and IHC, 82 on the basis of IHC alone, and 29 on the basis of clinical discretion. After adjustments for participants who died (n = 6), 149 of 164 patients (91%) completed a genetic assessment, and 111 were offered and completed genetic testing. Thirty‐four women (4.0% of the total cohort and 30.6% of those with genetic testing) were diagnosed with LS: 5 with mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), 9 with mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), 15 with mutS homolog 6 (MSH6), and 5 with PMS2. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of a navigated genetic program resulted in a high rate of genetic assessment (>90%) in patients with gynecologic cancer at risk for LS.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Cancer Society (704038)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uptake of Genetic Testing by Relatives of Lynch Syndrome Probands: A Systematic ReviewClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2013
- Cancer risk in Lynch SyndromeFamilial Cancer, 2013
- Barriers and Facilitators for Utilization of Genetic Counseling and Risk Assessment Services in Young Female Breast Cancer SurvivorsJournal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2012
- Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meetingGenetics in Medicine, 2012
- Why is genetic screening for autosomal dominant disorders underused in families? The case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasiaGenetics in Medicine, 2011
- Cancer Risks Associated With Germline Mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Genes in Lynch SyndromeJAMA, 2011
- Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramificationsClinical Genetics, 2009
- Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relativesGenetics in Medicine, 2009
- Methodologic Challenges in Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Physical ActivityAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
- Gynecologic Cancer as a “Sentinel Cancer” for Women With Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer SyndromeObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005