Distressed and distracted by COVID-19 during high-stakes virtual interviews: The role of job interview anxiety on performance and reactions.
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Applied Psychology
- Vol. 106 (8), 1103-1117
- https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000943
Abstract
Employers have increasingly turned to virtual interviews to facilitate online, socially distanced selection processes in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is little understanding about the experience of job candidates in these virtual interview contexts. We draw fromEvent System Theory (Morgeson et al., 2015) to advance and test a conceptual model that focuses on a high-stress, high-stakes setting and integrates literatures on workplace stress with literatures on applicant reactions. We predict that when applicants ruminate about COVID-19 during an interview and have higher levels of COVID-19 exhaustion, they will have higher levels of anxiety during virtual interviews, which in turn relates to reduced interview performance, lower perceptions of fairness, and reduced intentions to recommend the organization. Further, we predict that three factors capturing COVID-19 as an enduring and impactful event (COVID-19 duration, COVID-19 cases, COVID-19 deaths) will be positively related to COVID-19 exhaustion. We tested our propositions with 8,343 job applicants across 373 companies and 93 countries/regions. Consistent with predictions, we found a positive relationship between COVID-19 rumination and interview anxiety, and this relationship was stronger for applicants who experienced higher (vs. lower) levels of COVID-19 exhaustion. In turn, interview anxiety was negatively related to interview performance, fairness perceptions, and recommendation intentions. Moreover, using a relevant subset of the data (n = 6,136), we found that COVID-19 duration and deaths were positively related to COVID-19 exhaustion. This research offers several insights for understanding the virtual interview experience embedded in the pandemic and advances the literature on applicant reactions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2015-0220)
- Lanzillotti-McKethan Eminent Scholar Endowment
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of war exposure on air force personnel's mental health, job burnout and other organizational related outcomes.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2011
- A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.Psychological Methods, 2010
- The Criterion‐Related Validities and Perceived Fairness of the Situational Interview and the Situational Judgment Test in an Iranian OrganisationApplied Psychology, 2009
- What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009
- Rethinking RuminationPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2008
- Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought.Psychological Bulletin, 2008
- Repetitive Thought and Emotional Distress: Rumination and Worry as Prospective Predictors of Depressive and Anxious SymptomatologyCognitive Therapy and Research, 2007
- Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007
- Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory.Emotion, 2007
- Applicant Attraction to Organizations and Job Choice: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Correlates of Recruiting Outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005