A Technique to Reduce Incidence of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation During LASIK Flap Creation Using the VisuMax Femtosecond Laser
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Journal of Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 33 (9), 584-590
- https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20170621-06
Abstract
To identify risk factors for opaque bubble layer (OBL) formation and compare the incidence of OBL using a cone modification technique versus the original technique for LASIK flap creation using the VisuMax laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). This retrospective study examined videos of flap creation using the VisuMax laser to identify OBL occurrence. Eyes were divided into three groups: eyes where OBL occurred using the original technique (OBL group), eyes where OBL did not occur using the original technique (no OBL group), and eyes in which the cone modification technique was used for LASIK flap creation (larger flap diameter) (cone modification technique group). Preoperative measurements including simulated keratometry (flat and steep) values, white-to-white distance (WTW), pachymetry, patient age and gender, amount of correction, flap parameters, energy setting, corneal hysteresis, and corneal resistance factor were analyzed to identify parameters with statistical difference between the OBL and no OBL groups. Incidence of OBL was compared between the original and cone modification techniques. OBL incidence was significantly lower with the cone modification technique (7.6%; 7 of 92 eyes) than with the original technique (28.8%; 34 of 118 eyes) (Fisher's exact test, P = .0009). Factors identified with a significant difference between eyes with and without OBL using the original technique were: corneal thickness (OBL: 561.2 μm, no OBL: 549.6 μm, P = .0132), WTW diameter (OBL: 11.6 mm, no OBL: 11.9 mm, P = .0048), corneal resistance factor (OBL: 10.4 mm Hg, no OBL: 9.6 mm Hg, P = 0.0329), and corneal astigmatism (OBL: 0.80 diopter, no OBL: 1.00 diopter, P = .0472) CONCLUSIONS: Less astigmatic, thicker, denser, and smaller corneas increased the risk of OBL using the original technique for flap creation. The cone modification technique was associated with lower risk of OBL formation, even in eyes with significant risk factors for OBL using the original technique. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):584-590.].This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parametersInternational Ophthalmology, 2016
- Opaque bubble layer: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevanceJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2014
- In Vivo Structural Characteristics of the Femtosecond LASIK-Induced Opaque Bubble Layers with Ultrahigh-Resolution SD-OCTOphthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2010
- Rainbow Glare as an Optical Side Effect of IntraLASIKOphthalmology, 2008
- Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laserJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Sub-epithelial gas breakthrough during femtosecond laser flap creation for LASIKBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007
- Femtosecond Laser versus Mechanical Microkeratome for LASIK: A Randomized Controlled StudyOphthalmology, 2007
- Transient light sensitivity after femtosecond laser flap creation: Clinical findings and managementJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Anterior chamber gas bubbles after corneal flap creation with a femtosecond laserJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgeryCurrent Opinion in Opthalmology, 2002