Clickers Are Not Enough: Results of a Decade-Long Study Investigating Instructional Strategies in Chemistry
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of College Science Teaching
- Vol. 49 (3), 58-65
- https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst20_049_03_58
Abstract
Studies on the effectiveness of clickers in undergraduate chemistry courses are mixed, and there is disagreement on how to effectively leverage clickers to improve student learning performance.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Cooperative Learning To Teach Chemistry: A Meta-analytic ReviewJournal of Chemical Education, 2015
- Comparing the effectiveness of peer instruction to individual learning during a chromatography courseJournal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2015
- The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students' collaborative learningComputers & Education, 2015
- Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performanceComputers & Education, 2013
- Classroom Response Systems Have Not “Crossed the Chasm”: Estimating Numbers of Chemistry Faculty Who Use ClickersJournal of Chemical Education, 2012
- Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college coursesLearning, Media and Technology, 2008
- Gender Differences in the Use and Effectiveness of Personal Response DevicesJournal of Science Education and Technology, 2008
- Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course MaterialCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2008
- A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classroomsChemistry Education Research and Practice, 2008
- Using Interactive Anonymous Quizzes in Large Lecture General Chemistry CoursesJournal of Chemical Education, 1998