A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
Open Access
- 12 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Reproductive Health
- Vol. 19 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8
Abstract
With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: “Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?” We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care. One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12–2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08–2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044). One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people’s consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.Funding Information
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, San Francisco
- Office of Research on Women's Health
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping reviewBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2020
- Work-family balance and the subjective well-being of rural women in Sichuan, ChinaBMC Women's Health, 2020
- Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe worldContraception, 2019
- Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment methodBMC Women's Health, 2019
- Women’s Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an AbortionJAMA Psychiatry, 2017
- Perceived stress and emotional social support among women who are denied or receive abortions in the United States: a prospective cohort studyBMC Women's Health, 2014
- Self-induction of abortion among women in the United StatesReproductive Health Matters, 2010
- Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratioBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2003
- Relationship between prevalence rate ratios and odds ratios in cross-sectional studies.International Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- INTERPRETATION AND CHOICE OF EFFECT MEASURES IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987