Relatives’ perceived quality of palliative care: comparisons between care settings in which patients die
Open Access
- 16 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Palliative Care
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0224-x
Abstract
Dying in the preferred setting is an indicator of good palliative care quality. Most people prefer to die at home. But does the quality of care as perceived by their relatives vary depending on the care setting that is the place of death? The aim is to compare (from the relatives perspective) whether there are perceived differences in the quality of palliative care between the settings in which people die. Multivariate linear regression analyses have been carried out using an existing dataset containing information collected using the relatives’ version of the Consumer Quality Index (CQ-index) Palliative Care. The dataset includes 1368 relatives of patients with a wide variety of conditions who died in various locations: at home, in hospital, in residential care for the elderly, a hospice, palliative care unit or in another institution (e.g. institutions for people with intellectual disabilities or mental healthcare institutions). The relatives were the first contacts (family members or other people close to the patient) and they received the survey between 6 weeks and 6 months after the bereavement. Based on the raw data, differences between locations in terms of the perceived quality of care initially appeared inconsistent. The multivariate regression analyses however showed that relatives of people who died at home were generally the most positive about the palliative care that the patient and they themselves received when the patient was dying. The care provided by hospices also received a relatively good rating. In hospitals and in residential settings for care of the elderly, the care was rated less highly by the relatives. The quality of palliative care as experienced from the relatives’ perspective is highest when the patient dies at home or in a hospice. This is an argument for letting people die at home, if they so wish, as far as possible and feasible.Funding Information
- ZonMw (844003002)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospice care in the Netherlands: who applies and who is admitted to inpatient care?BMC Health Services Research, 2015
- Family carers providing support to a person dying in the home setting: A narrative literature reviewPalliative Medicine, 2015
- The effect and process evaluations of the national quality improvement programme for palliative care: the study protocolBMC Palliative Care, 2014
- Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic reviewBMC Palliative Care, 2013
- Measuring Relatives' Perspectives on the Quality of Palliative Care: The Consumer Quality Index Palliative CareJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012
- A new palliative care consultation team at the oncology department of a university hospital: an assessment of initial efficiency and effectivenessSupportive Care in Cancer, 2012
- Case‐Mix Adjustment of the CAHPS® Hospital SurveyHealth Services Research, 2005
- Family Perspectives on End-of-Life Care at the Last Place of CareJAMA, 2004
- Is There Evidence That Palliative Care Teams Alter End-of-Life Experiences of Patients and Their Caregivers?Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2003
- Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 2003