The impact of sexism on leadership in female-male climbing dyads
- 3 June 2020
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 15 (1)
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.2667
Abstract
We investigated how sexism affected leadership in mixed-gender alpine climbing-dyads. We asked whether benevolent sexism would impair, and hostile sexism would increase (as a form of resistance) women’s leadership; and whether benevolent sexism would increase men’s leadership (as a form of paternalism). A correlational study assessed reported leading behaviour of alpine climbers. Then a vignette-based experiment presented climbers with cross-gender targets, of which three were sexist (non-feminist), and one feminist (non-sexist), and assessed leading intentions depending on targets’ and participants’ gender attitudes. Findings showed that women endorsing benevolent sexism indicated lower leading intentions with targets expressing benevolent sexism (i.e., benevolent and ambivalent men) as compared to hostile sexist men. Moreover, women’s benevolent sexism negatively affected their leading intentions with men endorsing the same gender ideology. Unexpectedly, women with low endorsement of hostile sexism reported higher leading intentions with a hostile sexist man than an ambivalent one, and with an ambivalent than a benevolent man. Conversely, men intended to lead more with female targets who expressed benevolent sexism, accommodating these women’s expectations. Further, men intended to lead more with ambivalent women, than with women deviating from gender stereotypes (i.e., feminist women, or hostile sexist women – who lack expected benevolence based on gender stereotypes). We conclude that benevolent sexism likely reinforces traditional gender roles in a leadership context when men face women who fit the gender stereotype; and when women are benevolently sexist, themselves. Moreover, low hostile sexist women confront men’s hostility with higher leading intentions, as a form of resistance.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reactance to (or Acceptance of) StereotypesZeitschrift für Psychologie, 2015
- Men as Allies Against SexismSage Open, 2014
- Why Is Benevolent Sexism Appealing?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2012
- Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011
- How Nice of Us and How Dumb of Me: The Effect of Exposure to Benevolent Sexism on Women’s Task and Relational Self-DescriptionsSex Roles, 2009
- How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism InventorySex Roles, 2009
- Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women's performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007
- The burden of benevolent sexism: how it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalitiesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2005
- Clearing the Air: Identity Safety Moderates the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Women's Leadership Aspirations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic ProcessesEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 2000