Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?
Open Access
- 12 April 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Intelligence
- Vol. 5 (2), 13
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020013
Abstract
A frequently reported finding is that general mental ability (GMA) is the best single psychological predictor of job performance. Furthermore, specific abilities often add little incremental validity beyond GMA, suggesting that they are not useful for predicting job performance criteria once general intelligence is accounted for. We review these findings and their historical background, along with different approaches to studying the relative influence of g and narrower abilities. Then, we discuss several recent studies that used relative importance analysis to study this relative influence and that found that specific abilities are equally good, and sometimes better, predictors of work performance than GMA. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and sketching future areas for research.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014
- Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments.American Psychologist, 2012
- INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF PERCEPTUAL SPEED AND ACCURACY OVER GENERAL MENTAL ABILITYPersonnel Psychology, 2008
- General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- Does Psychology make a significant difference in our lives?American Psychologist, 2004
- THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPANPersonnel Psychology, 1999
- Why g matters: The complexity of everyday lifeIntelligence, 1997
- Predicting job performance: Not much more than g..Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINSPersonnel Psychology, 1990
- Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1984