Effects of industrial agglomeration and environmental regulation on urban ecological efficiency: evidence from 269 cities in China
- 31 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Vol. 28 (46), 66389-66408
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15467-0
Abstract
The ecological environment and economic development are double-edged swords. Nevertheless, we can still achieve green and coordinated development through environmental regulations and industrial agglomeration. Based on the panel data from 269 cities in China from 2008 to 2017, using the SBM-DEA model, the Malmquist-Luenberger (ML) index, and the spatial Durbin model (SDM) under different weight matrices, this paper explored the spatial pattern of ecological efficiency, the internal evolution mechanism, and the spillover effects of industrial agglomeration and environmental regulation on ecological efficiency. The results demonstrated that China’s urban ecological efficiency had an obvious spatial pattern of “high in the east and low in the west.” Due to the different life cycles of cities, the internal evolution mechanism of urban ecological efficiency had significant differences. Pure technological efficiency (PEFFCH), technological progress (TECH), and scale efficiency (SECH) have contributed the most to the ecological efficiency of the eastern, central, and western regions, respectively. Furthermore, a significant U-shaped relationship existed between industrial agglomeration and ecological efficiency. In particular, urban ecological efficiency will be improved when the industrial agglomeration level exceeds a certain scale. However, the spillover effects of industrial agglomeration were more sensitive to distance factors, leading to failure of the significance test under the economic distance and asymmetric economic distance matrix. The “innovation compensation effect” of environmental regulation was greater than the “compliance cost,” which verified the applicability of the “Porter Hypothesis” in urban ecological efficiency to a certain extent. Finally, the geographical detector showed that each variable had a certain impact on the urban ecological efficiency, and the impact of the interaction term was greater than that of a single variable.Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471103)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivityEcological Economics, 2011
- Productivity growth and environmental regulations - accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist–Luenberger indexEcological Economics, 2011
- Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods, and inferencesJournal of Geographical Systems, 2011
- Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter HypothesisJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2011
- Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approachOmega, 2010
- Geographical Detectors‐Based Health Risk Assessment and its Application in the Neural Tube Defects Study of the Heshun Region, ChinaInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010
- A sampling approach to estimate the log determinant used in spatial likelihood problemsJournal of Geographical Systems, 2009
- Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function ApproachJournal of Environmental Management, 1997
- Increasing Returns and Economic GeographyJournal of Political Economy, 1991
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1978