Comparison of strategies for adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk surgical patients: a before and after intervention study
Open Access
- 18 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 10 (4), e001583
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001583
Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of perioperative morbimortality. Despite significant efforts to advance evidence-based practice, prevention rates remain inadequate in many centres. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies aimed at improving adherence to adequate VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients at high risk of VTE. Method Before and after intervention study conducted at a tertiary hospital. Adherence to adequate VTE prophylaxis was compared according to three strategies consecutively implemented from January 2019 to December 2020. A dedicated hospitalist physician alone (strategy A) or in conjunction with a nurse (strategy B) overlooked the postoperative period to ensure adherence and correct inadequacies. Finally, a multidisciplinary team approach (strategy C) focused on promoting adequate VTE prophylaxis across multiple stages of care—from the operating room (ie, preoperative team-based checklist) to collaboration with clinical pharmacists in the postoperative period—was implemented. Results We analysed 2074 surgical patients: 783 from January to June 2019 (strategy A), 669 from July 2019 to May 2020 (strategy B), and 622 from June to December 2020 (strategy C). VTE prophylaxis adherence rates for strategies (A), (B) and (C) were (median (25th–75th percentile)) 43.29% (31.82–51.69), 50% (42.57–55.80) and 92.31% (91.38–93.51), respectively (pA=B). There was a significant reduction in non-compliance on all analysed criteria (risk stratification (A (25.5%), B (22%), C (6%)), medical documentation (A (68%), B (55.2%) C (9%)) and medical prescription (A (51.85%), B (48%), C (6.10%)) after implementation of strategy C (pConclusion Perioperative VTE prophylaxis strategies that relied exclusively on physicians and/or nurses were associated with suboptimal execution and prevention. A multidisciplinary team-based approach that covers multiple stages of patient care significantly increased adherence to adequate VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients at high risk of developing perioperative VTE.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety programImplementation Science, 2013
- Checklists to Reduce Diagnostic ErrorsAcademic Medicine, 2011
- Venous Thromboembolism: A Public Health ConcernAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- Physician compliance with advanced electronic alerts for preventing venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patientsJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- Continuing Medical Education Effect on Clinical OutcomesSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2009
- The Science of ImprovementJAMA, 2008
- Profilaxia da trombose venosa profunda: aplicação prática e conhecimento teórico em um hospital geralJornal Vascular Brasileiro, 2008
- Incorrect use of thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in medical and surgical patients: results of a multicentric, observational and cross‐sectional study in BrazilJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2006
- DVT Prevention: What Is Happening in the “Real World”?Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2003
- A Computerized Reminder System to Increase the Use of Preventive Care for Hospitalized PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001