Discrepant abortion reporting by interview methodology among men from the United States National Survey of Family Growth (2015-2017)
- 1 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contraception
- Vol. 112, 111-115
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Young Men at High Risk of Fathering an Unintended Birth Talk About Their Procreative IdentitiesJournal of Family Issues, 2016
- Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysisBehavior Research Methods, 2014
- ACASI Gender-of-Interviewer Voice Effects on Reports to Questions about Sensitive * Behaviors Among Young AdultsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2012
- Perceptions of Male Knowledge and Support Among U.S. Women Obtaining AbortionsWomen's Health Issues, 2011
- How to improve the validity of sexual behaviour reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countriesTropical Medicine & International Health, 2010
- Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patientsSexually Transmitted Infections, 2005
- Effects of Interviewer Characteristics on Reported Sexual Behavior of California Latino CouplesHispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2002
- Effects of Interviewer Gender, Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording on Responses to Questions Concerning Sexual BehaviorPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1996
- Male Procreative Consciousness and Responsibility:Journal of Family Issues, 1991
- Family Size Preferences and Sexual Permissiveness as Factors Differentiating Abortion ActivistsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1982