Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S.
Open Access
- 13 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 10 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68264-z
Abstract
The human-mediated spread of exotic and invasive species often leads to unintentional and harmful consequences. Invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one such species that have been repeatedly translocated throughout the United States and cause extensive damage to natural ecosystems, threatened and endangered species, agricultural resources, and private lands. In 2005, a newly established population of wild pigs was confirmed in Fulton County, Illinois, U.S. In 2011, a state-wide wild pig damage management program involving federal, state, and local government authorities directed a concerted effort to remove wild pigs from the county until the last wild pig (of 376 total) was successfully removed in 2016. We examined surveillance data from camera traps at bait sites and records of wild pig removals during this elimination program to identify environmental and anthropogenic factors that optimized removal of this population. Our results revealed that wild pigs used bait sites most during evening and nocturnal periods and on days with lower daily maximum temperatures. Increased removals of wild pigs coincided with periods of cold weather. We also identified that fidelity and time spent at bait sites by wild pigs was not influenced by increasing removals of wild pigs. Finally, the costs to remove wild pigs averaged $50 per wild pig (6.8 effort hours per wild pig) for removing the first 99% of the animals. Cost for removing the last 1% increased 84-fold, and averaged 122.8 effort hours per wild pig removed. Our results demonstrated that increased effort in removing wild pigs using bait sites should be focused during periods of environmental stress to maximize removal efficiency. These results inform elimination programs attempting to remove newly established populations of wild pigs, and ultimately prevent population and geographic expansion.This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Likelihood-based and Bayesian methods for Tweedie compound Poisson linear mixed modelsStatistics and Computing, 2012
- Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutionsJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011
- Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradoxAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2009
- Eradication of Feral Pigs From Pinnacles National MonumentThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008
- How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2008
- Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa)in Luxembourg over a 10-year periodEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2008
- Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United StatesEcological Economics, 2005
- EFFICACY OF HUNTING, FEEDING, AND FENCING TO REDUCE CROP DAMAGE BY WILD BOARSThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2004
- Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) occurrence in highly fragmented Mediterranean landscapesCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2002
- Using aspects of predator-prey theory to evaluate helicopter shooting for feral pig controlWildlife Research, 1999