Clinical Predictive Factors of Pathological EEG in Children with Febrile Seizures and Their Association with Subsequent Epileptic Seizures
- 27 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy
- Vol. 11 (01), 15-20
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736214
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify clinical parameters predicting either a pathological EEG or a subsequent epileptic seizure (SES), based on the relation between paroxysmal EEG abnormalities and clinical features in children who presented at least one febrile seizure (FS). We collected data of children who presented to our department during the period 2013 to 2018 for EEG recording as part of their febrile seizure assessment. Only children aged between 1 month to 5 years were included. Both the clinical and EEG data were retrospectively collected and statistically studied. We performed a detailed analysis of the EEG recordings. SES was identified for patients with sufficient follow-up. A total of 120 children were included in the study, of whom 48% had EEG abnormalities. Psychomotor retardation (p = 0.002), completion of an EEG within 7 days of the last FS (p = 0.046), and late age (> 3 years) of the first FS onset (p = 0.021) were significantly associated with a pathological EEG. In multivariate analysis, performing early EEG (< 7 days from the last FS) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.35; p = 0.043; confidence interval [CI]: 1.028–5.375) and psychomotor retardation (OR: 4.19; p = 0.008; CI: 1.46–12) were independent predictors of a pathological EEG. Of 120 patients, 45 had a follow-up. However, only 10 (22.22%) had SES. Children with SES tended more to have a psychomotor delay, compared with children without SES (50% vs. 14.28%, p = 0.029). Moreover, the percentage of initial abnormal EEG in patients with SES was significantly higher than those without SES (70% vs. 34.28%, p = 0.05). Even though some FS characteristics predict EEG abnormalities, they are not always associated with SES. We highlight the importance of performing an EEG in the group of children who had both FS and psychomotor retardation. This is most likely the group at the highest risk of developing epilepsy. Received: 25 April 2021 Accepted: 20 August 2021 Publication Date: 27 September 2021 (online) © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, GermanyKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk for developing epilepsy and epileptiform discharges on EEG in patients with febrile seizuresBrain & Development, 2013
- EEG characteristics predict subsequent epilepsy in children with febrile seizureBrain & Development, 2012
- Febrile seizures: Mechanisms and relationship to epilepsyBrain & Development, 2009
- Role of early EEG and neuroimaging in determination of prognosis in children with complex febrile seizurePediatrics International, 2004
- Febrile seizures: an updateArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2004
- Unconsciousness and delirious behavior in children with febrile seizuresPediatric Neurology, 2004
- Febrile Seizures: Is the EEG a Useful Predictor of Recurrences?Clinical Pediatrics, 1997
- Febrile Seizures: Clinical Characteristics and Initial EEGEpilepsia, 1992
- When does an EEG contribute to the management of febrile seizures?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- Correlation between EEG Abnormality and Age in ChildhoodNeuropediatrics, 1978