Psychological resilience early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Stressors, resources, and coping strategies in a national sample of Americans.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Psychologist
- Vol. 76 (5), 715-728
- https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000813
Abstract
Spreading rapidly across the United States beginning in the spring of 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic radically disruptedAmericans' lives. Previous studies of community-wide disasters suggested people are fairly resilient and identified resources and strategies that promote that resilience. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic is in some ways unique, with high levels of uncertainty, evolving implications and restrictions, and varied and uneven impacts. How resilient were Americans as the pandemic progressed? What psychosocial resources and coping strategies facilitated adjustment as the country moved into a summer of uneven reopenings and reclosures? Data from a national sample of 674 Americans were gathered at the height of early lockdowns and peaking infections in mid-April, 2020, and again, 5 and 10 weeks later. The study aimed to determine levels and sources of distress and to identify the resources and coping efforts that promoted or impeded resilience. Early levels of distress diminished to some extent over subsequent months while levels of wellbeing were comparable with usual norms, suggesting a largely resilient response. COVID-19-related stress exposure also decreased gradually over time. Older age, higher levels of mindfulness and social support, and meaning focused coping predicted better adjustment, reflecting resilience, while avoidance coping was particularly unhelpful. In models predicting change over time, approach-oriented coping (i.e., active coping, meaning-focused coping, and seeking social support) was minimally predictive of subsequent adjustment. Given the unique and ongoing circumstances presented by COVID-19, specific interventions targeting psychosocial resources and coping identified here may help to promote resilience as the pandemic continues to unfold.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R34AA027455)
- University of Connecticut
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- A checklist for testing measurement invarianceEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012
- Meaning making coping, making sense, and post-traumatic growth following the 9/11 terrorist attacksThe Journal of Positive Psychology, 2012
- Waiting Well: Tips for Navigating Painful UncertaintySocial and Personality Psychology Compass, 2012
- Weighing the Costs of DisasterPsychological Science in the Public Interest, 2010
- Coping with displacement from Hurricane Katrina: predictors of one-year post-traumatic stress and depression symptom trajectoriesAnxiety, Stress & Coping, 2009
- Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire – development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short)Personality and Individual Differences, 2006
- The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A Proposed Measure of PTSD Criterion A2American Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief copeInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1997
- The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety InventoriesBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1995