Sharing Mechanical Ventilator: In Vitro Evaluation of Circuit Cross-Flows and Patient Interactions
Open Access
- 20 July 2021
- Vol. 11 (7), 547
- https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070547
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of mechanical ventilators was reported and ventilator sharing between patients was proposed as an ultimate solution. Two lung simulators were ventilated by one anesthesia machine connected through two respiratory circuits and T-pieces. Five different combinations of compliances (30–50 mL × cmH2O−1) and resistances (5–20 cmH2O × L−1 × s−1) were tested. The ventilation setting was: pressure-controlled ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure 15 cmH2O, inspiratory pressure 10 cmH2O, respiratory rate 20 bpm. Pressures and flows from all the circuit sections have been recorded and analyzed. Simulated patients with equal compliance and resistance received similar ventilation. Compliance reduction from 50 to 30 mL × cmH2O−1 decreased the tidal volume (VT) by 32% (418 ± 49 vs. 285 ± 17 mL). The resistance increase from 5 to 20 cmH2O × L−1 × s−1 decreased VT by 22% (425 ± 69 vs. 331 ± 51 mL). The maximal alveolar pressure was lower at higher compliance and resistance values and decreased linearly with the time constant (r² = 0.80, p < 0.001). The minimum alveolar pressure ranged from 15.5 ± 0.04 to 16.57 ± 0.04 cmH2O. Cross-flows between the simulated patients have been recorded in all the tested combinations, during both the inspiratory and expiratory phases. The simultaneous ventilation of two patients with one ventilator may be unable to match individual patient’s needs and has a high risk of cross-interference.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Toughest Triage — Allocating Ventilators in a PandemicThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Hospital surge capacity in a tertiary emergency referral centre during the COVID‐19 outbreak in ItalyAnaesthesia, 2020
- 0.9% saline versus Plasma-Lyte as initial fluid in children with diabetic ketoacidosis (SPinK trial): a double-blind randomized controlled trialCritical Care, 2020
- Use of a Single Ventilator to Support 4 Patients: Laboratory Evaluation of a Limited ConceptRespiratory Care, 2012
- Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Increasing ventilator surge capacity in disasters: Ventilation of four adult-human-sized sheep on a single ventilator with a modified circuitResuscitation, 2008
- A Single Ventilator for Multiple Simulated Patients to Meet Disaster SurgeAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Peak pressures during manual ventilation.2005
- Manual ventilation and risk of barotrauma: primum non nocere.2005
- Artificial ventilation of the lungs for emergenciesFrontiers of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2000