Immigration and the Boundaries of Citizenship: The Institutions of Immigrants’ Political Transnationalism
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Migration Review
- Vol. 34 (4), 1126-1154
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400403
Abstract
This article analyzes the emergence and the institutional structure of contemporary immigrants’ transnational politics. It poses three questions: 1) How is transnational politics structured? 2) How can we explain the current emergence of transnational political linkages? 3) Who participates and who benefits from political transnationalism. The article focuses on the cases of the Dominican Republic, Haiti and El Salvador and argues that they share an institutional pattern of transnational politics in which there are three main actors: the state apparatus of the country of origin; the political parties of the country of origin; and migrant organizations in the country of reception. The article links the rise of this pattern of transnational politics to the need of the states of origin to guarantee the flow of remittances, the organization of immigrants in the country of reception, and the consolidation of competitive politics in democratic regimes. Although the analysis is based on the experiences of Latin American and Caribbean countries and their emigrants in the United States, the article argues that this institutional pattern may transcend this particular region. This article analyzes the emergence and the institutional structure of contemporary immigrants’ transnational politics. It poses three questions: 1) How is transnational politics structured? 2) How can we explain the current emergence of transnational political linkages? 3) Who participates and who benefits from political transnationalism. The article focuses on the cases of the Dominican Republic, Haiti and El Salvador and argues that they share an institutional pattern of transnational politics in which there are three main actors: the state apparatus of the country of origin; the political parties of the country of origin; and migrant organizations in the country of reception. The article links the rise of this pattern of transnational politics to the need of the states of origin to guarantee the flow of remittances, the organization of immigrants in the country of reception, and the consolidation of competitive politics in democratic regimes. Although the analysis is based on the experiences of Latin American and Caribbean countries and their emigrants in the United States, the article argues that this institutional pattern may transcend this particular region.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping Dominican transnationalism: narrow and broad transnational practicesEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- Transnational migrant communities and Mexican migration to the USEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- The Otavalo trade diaspora: social capital and transnational entrepreneurshipEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- Mistrust, fragmented solidarity, and transnational migration: Colombians in New York City and Los AngelesEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- Terrains of blood and nation: Haitian transnational social fieldsEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- From Hermano Lejano to Hermano Mayor: the dialectics of Salvadoran transnationalismEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- Guatemalan Mayan migration to Los Angeles: constructing transnational linkages in the context of the settlement processEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research fieldEthnic and Racial Studies, 1999
- The Emergence of a Transnational Social Formation and The Mirage of Return Migration Among Dominican TransmigrantsIdentities, 1997
- Migrant Remittances, Labor Markets, and Household Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of Low-Income Household Strategies in the Caribbean BasinSocial Forces, 1995