Coalitions that Clash: California's Climate Leadership and the Perpetuation of Environmental Inequality
- 19 July 2021
- book chapter
- book charpter
- Published by Emerald
Abstract
At a time when the US federal government failed to act on climate change, California's success as a subnational climate policy leader has been widely celebrated. However, California's landmark climate law drove a wedge between two segments of the state's environmental community. On one side was a coalition of “market-oriented” environmental social movement organizations (SMOs), who allied with private corporations to advance market-friendly climate policy. On the other side was a coalition of “justice-oriented” environmental SMOs, who viewed capitalist markets as the problem and sought climate policy that would mitigate the uneven distribution of environmental harms within the state. The social movement literature is not well equipped to understand this case, in which coalitional politics helped one environmental social movement succeed in its policy objectives at the expense of another. In this chapter, we draw on legislative and regulatory texts, archival material, and interviews with relevant political actors to compare the policymaking influence of each of these coalitions, and we argue that the composition of the two coalitions is the key to understanding why one was more successful than the other. At the same time, we point out the justice-oriented coalition's growing power, as market-oriented SMOs seek to preserve their legitimacy.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Movement Organizations, Synergistic Tactics and Environmental Public PolicySocial Forces, 2010
- The Political Consequences of Social MovementsAnnual Review of Sociology, 2010
- Best in Show? Climate and Environmental Justice Policy in CaliforniaEnvironmental Justice, 2009
- Cross-Cutting Influences of Environmental Protest and LegislationSocial Forces, 2009
- Race, Income, and Environmental Inequality in the United StatesSociological Perspectives, 2008
- The Stages of the Policy Process and the Equal Rights Amendment, 1972–1982American Journal of Sociology, 2006
- When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights AmendmentAmerican Sociological Review, 2004
- Protest and Political OpportunitiesAnnual Review of Sociology, 2004
- Movement-Countermovement Dynamics and the Emergence of New Institutions: The Case of "White Flight" Schools in MississippiSocial Forces, 2002
- Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977