Changes in Hypertension Diagnostic Criteria Enhance Early Identification of at Risk College Students
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1), 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000114
Abstract
The revised (ACC/AHA) hypertension diagnostic criteria were intended to facilitate early identification and intervention among those with hypertension to improve patient health and lessen burden on the healthcare system. The purpose of this study was to examine fitness, anthropometric, and blood profile differences between college students who were or were not reclassified as hypertensive using the revised hypertension diagnostic criteria. Students completed an objective fitness assessment between September 2015 and April 2018. A total of 2724 students (71% men; 21 ± 1 yr) who were classified as prehypertensive under the old (JCN7) diagnostic criteria were included in the analyses. Men reclassified as having stage 1 hypertension using the ACC/AHA diagnostic criteria had a significantly higher body mass index (26.48 vs 25.66 kg·m−2, P < 0.001), and body fat percentage (17.30% vs 16.15%, P < 0.001), abdominal girth (33.58 vs 32.81 in. P < 0.001), and lower predicted aerobic fitness (36.20 vs 37.63 mL·kg−1⋅min−1, P < 0.001) compared with those who remained classified as prehypertensive (i.e., elevated). Women reclassified as having stage 1 hypertension using the ACC/AHA diagnostic criteria had a significantly higher body mass index (25.28 vs 24.46 kg·m−2, P = 0.015), and body fat percentage (28.63% vs 27.26%, P = 0.005), abdominal girth (30.10 vs 29.38 in. P = 0.011), and lower predicted aerobic fitness (34.07 vs 35.19 mL·kg−1⋅min−1, P = 0.031) compared with those who remained classified as prehypertensive. Blood profiles did not differ between those who were and those who were not reclassified as hypertensive for either sex. The odds of being reclassified varied from 3% to 7% based on the increase of a unit in each body composition variable and predicted aerobic fitness for both sexes. HDL was only predictive among men, and LDL was only predictive among women. The change in hypertension diagnostic criteria had the intended impact, as an increased number of college students with poorer fitness and less favorable anthropometric profiles were diagnosed as having hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice GuidelinesHypertension, 2018
- 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in AdultsJournal of Invasive Cardiology, 2018
- Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure GuidelineJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018
- Conducting Research on the Economics of Hypertension to Improve Cardiovascular HealthAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017
- Trends in the Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among Young Adults in the United States, 1999 to 2014Hypertension, 2017
- Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart AssociationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016
- Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participantsThe Lancet, 2016
- 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertensionEuropean Heart Journal, 2013
- Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Effect of Weight LossJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureThe JNC 7 ReportJAMA, 2003