Cataract surgery coverage rates for Indigenous and non‐Indigenous Australians: the National Eye Health Survey
- 18 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 207 (6), 256-261
- https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00057
Abstract
To determine cataract surgery coverage rates for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. National cross-sectional population-based survey. Thirty randomly selected Australian geographic sites, stratified by remoteness. 3098 non-Indigenous Australians aged 50 years or more and 1738 Indigenous Australians aged 40 years or more, recruited and examined in the National Eye Health Survey (NEHS) between March 2015 and April 2016. Participants underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire that collected socio-demographic information and past ocular care history, including cataract surgery. For those with visual acuity worse than 6/12, anterior segment photography and slit lamp examinations were conducted. Cataract surgery coverage rates according to WHO and NEHS definitions; associated risk factors. Cataract surgery coverage rates calculated with the NEHS definition 1 of vision impairment (visual acuity worse than 6/12) were lower for Indigenous than non-Indigenous participants (58.5% v 88.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.32; P < 0.001). According to the World Health Organization definition (eligibility criterion: best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/18), coverage rates were 92.5% and 98.9% for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians respectively. Greater age was significantly associated with higher cataract surgery coverage in Indigenous (OR, 1.41 per 10 years; P = 0.048) and non-Indigenous Australians (OR, 1.58 per 10 years; P = 0.004). The cataract surgery coverage rate was higher for non-Indigenous than Indigenous Australians, indicating the need to improve cataract surgery services for Indigenous Australians. The WHO definition of the coverage rate may overestimate the cataract surgery coverage rate in developed nations and should be applied with caution.Keywords
Funding Information
- Department of Health, Australian Government
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of visual recovery and refractive stability between femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification: Six-month follow-upJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2015
- Access to eye health services among indigenous Australians: an area level analysisBMC Ophthalmology, 2012
- The global cost of eliminating avoidable blindnessIndian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
- Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2011
- Safety and Efficacy of Phacoemulsification Compared with Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery by a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial: Six-Week ResultsOphthalmology, 2005
- Increase in cataract surgery prevalence from 1992-1994 to 1997-2000: analysis of two population cross-sectionsClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2004
- Projected prevalence of age‐related cataract and cataract surgery in Australia for the years 2001 and 2021: pooled data from two population‐based surveysClinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2003
- Utilisation of eye care services by urban and rural AustraliansBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002
- Costs of accessing surgical specialists by rural and remote residentsAnz Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Phaco-Emulsification and AspirationAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1967